Your argument stops and crumbles on the assumption that the outlets that agree with your position are not "jumping on bandwagons" and are not trying to manipulate their readers.
When we talk about motivations of authors we are talking about mind reading or making wild assumptions. Something I can not do.
Every side has a bias or motivation. Assuming people who you agree with have the right motivation is just as dumb as you think the "women falling for this shit" are.
Articles are not "the company we keep". We are disgussing ideas and words, something everyone has, not moral superiority.