That's the mealy mouthed resolution we came to.
We lost funding because we are not diverse enough - a woman's shelter that takes all women in need. No men so no funding from that well know national funding stream for a couple of years. We were charity non grata and couldn't get a detailed response from them. We pondered that and then, because we were already mentoring a group setting up a men's shelter, we used that to get some funding back. And we refer to a mixed sex group, some of our counsellors chose to do some work there too. We use that to show how diversely we support men, transmen and transwomen - we (as a whole) pay, we refer, we train, we volunteer and we work paid for hours.
We have a robust explanation for maintaining our single sex policy - trans individuals require specific counselling and referral to specific services because they are trans. We offer support to any members of staff who want to add this to their skill set/knowledge.
That's it. No more compromises. And our female centre stays female only.
We have had many discussions over the last couple of years about Sarah's case, and many other batshit things happening in the sector. We hope we are too small to be noticed, though we did have to fend off one challenge last year!
That amounted to:
TW: Let me in
Us: No.
TW: LET ME IN
Us: No, but we will give you a lift to XX
TW: Oh, OK then!
Hopefully that will be it!