Well good grief. How embarrassing.
To be fair, it could well have been written by a "research scientist" because that's very broad, any newly-minted PhD student for example.
Couple of points immediately spring to mind.
(1) It is entirely "have cake and eat it" as we would expect, because everybody must agree that Genderism is Innate And Biologically Real Look At These Tests Therefore Most Oppressed, and yet It Would Be Very Wrong To Test Instead Of Just Accepting The Magic Words That Anybody Could Say.
(2) the genitalsand the brain develop independently, and we know of no biological process which forcesthem to align Even if this were true (which it is not because we are not Meat Lego) isn't it strange that anybody at all manages to alight on the "correct" innate gender, because how can gender be innate if these developments are independent?