So LandOfConfusion and MauisLeftNipple are we supposed to disregard what she has to say?
Is it like PosiePatker situation where we're supposed to disregard what she has to say because she's been on Fox?
As a person who isn't Catholic and who is not (by a long shot) a fan of the church am I supposed to disregard Caroline Farrow because she's Catholic and holds views I wholeheartedly disagree with?
Do you believe that we can fundamentally disagree on certain topics and agree on others? Or am I tainted if I support someone - on one issue - who I think has repugnant ideas on an other?
And does this change when someone is made a persona non grata due to our agreeing ideas not being the mainstream narrative?
I haven't watched this video yet. Should I not because it will mean I support the racist, xenophobic killer?
If some people are delegitimised by their appearance on certain channels, are they delegitimised by their appearance on others? If the NZ nurse appeared on BBC R4's Today programme at the 8am slot just after the needs (the main slot) for an interview, would that turn things around?
I'm genuinely wondering btw - and realise I may sound disingenuous, but I'm not - because on threads like this it becomes an issue where I don't see a way out?
Relating it to this thread in particular, to not derail, are you suggesting that we shouldn't listen to the NZ nurse? If not, what or who should I watch/listen to from NZ, instead of this video, that is from a "safe" source and has the same info?