She created Translator, software that offers diversity and inclusion training tools for businesses. Largely because the exercises are virtual rather than in person, it allows employees to be more honest in their responses. Companies can see how many staff are unhappy with their culture and alter accordingly, while employees are trained to understand and accommodate other perspectives.
So are these 'virtual' responses anonymised, or just typed/recorded rather than spoken aloud in a meeting? Because the former allows honesty without fear of witch-huntery but the latter surely just provides saveable evidence of wrongthink? Either way, the phrase 'employees are trained to understand and accommodate other perspectives' isn't exactly reassuring.
And the pouting. Always with the Mick Jagger pouting.