They're exposing themselves more and more. Which is all to the good.
It's getting hard now to deny the absolute misogyny and inability to see or think about anything but the TQ+ interests. Which makes it so much easier for a court to see that female interests are at times going to be incompatible when a service is politically focused on a TQ+ brief, because they have no remaining ability to see or care about female clients, and see those female voices and needs and realities as nothing more than hostile threats to their own agenda.
Incompatible for service provision. QED.
The Aesop's Fable of dog in the manger gets stronger and stronger: I do not need myself the specific resource that you are dependent on, but will do everything in my power to prevent you having it. Because reasons.
Unreasonable. Odd. Unacceptable. Have odd political views by all means, but they cannot be acceptable as a reason to deny other people equality of service and access.