There's a difference between rights and privileges. When activists demand everything to be their way in the world they are then demanding extreme privileges. Those are going to come out of the rights of others.
I am also troubled by the new definition of 'safe' which appears to be interpreted as no debate, ever, but only on certain topics I presume? How do universities challenge the thinking of students if debates cannot be used and if nuance completely disappears? Most questions of the kind we discuss here have winners and losers for each solution, and if they cannot be discussed at all and if all debate must be stopped for reasons of this new 'safety', it's pretty obvious that this is a push for extreme privileges.