I thought posters may like to read this. Sturgeon and Davidson both declined to comment(!):
Sturgeon challenged to trans debate
www.thetimes.co.uk/article/df755c50-cd8d-11ec-b225-ba85b2bd8624?shareToken=6f322fc7585c5b6586b162cab7661247
"Cherry said: “There is in fact nothing transphobic about defining what a woman is. The Equality Act defines a woman as a female of any age. Is that transphobic?”
She said politicians could not defend women’s rights or legislate for trans rights if they could not define the people protected by those rights.
Cherry added: “It is not trans people we fear, but men, and many of us have the experience of working with survivors of male violence and sexual abuse to know that we are right to be fearful . . . it is a pity that no SNP conference has ever properly debated these issues.
“It would have been useful to have had a debate of the calibre of the famous Nato membership debate back in 2012 . . . so, here’s my challenge to Sturgeon and Davidson. I’ll debate these issues with you in public. Name the date and the place and I will be there.
“As the For Women Scotland group has said: ‘Asserting you are right and refusing to hear opponents is not an argument’.” Sturgeon and Davidson declined to comment."