Good grief. JKR is being cast as the Judas Goat for all social ills, isn't she?
Women in poverty. Prosecco consumption with lunch. Socialising with other women without male chaperones. Literacy. A much needed boost to cinema. Philanthropy.
How does anybody look at her corpus of work and her personal writings and actions and think assigning adverse motives or actions to her is at all appropriate? It's not done by anybody in good faith. I strongly suspect such attributions and accusations are instances of Frankfurt's Bullshit.
It is impossible for someone to lie unless he thinks he knows the truth. Producing bullshit requires no such conviction. A person who lies is thereby responding to the truth, and he is to that extent respectful of it. When an honest man speaks, he says only what he believes to be true; and for the liar, it is correspondingly indispensable that he considers his statements to be false. For the bullshitter, however, all these bets are off: he is neither on the side of the true nor on the side of the false. His eye is not on the facts at all, as the eyes of the honest man and of the liar are, except insofar as they may be pertinent to his interest in getting away with what he says. He does not care whether the things he says describe reality correctly. He just picks them out, or makes them up, to suit his purpose.
www2.csudh.edu/ccauthen/576f12/frankfurt__harry_-_on_bullshit.pdf