Zoe Williams article rewritten

[crispsarny]

Not sure if already posted?

twitter.com/anyabike/status/1512118526160613381?s=20&t=Um5NPFFe0Zf46xNd14ueTw

twitter.com/tonydowson5/status/1511742438297137157

See edits here

I made a comment about this yesterday on Twitter. She’s now blocked me. Poor Zoe must be feeling a little bruised what with people pointing out she’s a shit journalist

needs a new job has brought more sunlight though

She wrote a very woe-is-me thread after blocking half of Twitter yesterday. Amusing levels of delusion.

From the tweet on the first link

"where there are real people living hard lives underneath the issue"

yes, those living hard lives under the issue include female people as well as TW. The fact this highly naiive woman has never met any and is absolutely clueless about the issues says a great deal.

Yet again 'people' means 'males'.

And her complaint is that female need is to be met too . Not instead of, just too .

I'm just endlessly baffled that to so many who are so passionate about genderism, it's not enough to meet TQ+ peoples needs. You apparently have to know that females have less, matter less and are suffering. Equality is apparently a terrible, awful thing. Including females is apparently a terrible, awful thing.

Rationality really does seem to have left the building.

I contemplated writing a letter about William's article to the Guardian, but there is no point, is there. Our views are blasphemy, and just as blasphemy accusations cannot really be beaten with rational arguments, neither can the kinds of statements the Guardian now supports.

Still, it is horrifying to observe, in practise, how much contempt many public figures have for female people. Or at least those individuals of the female sex who have not bettered themselves by identifying out of a category which is now defined as a feeling based on just a collection of sexist stereotypes.

She has has her arse kicked

Not was her article pithy and patronizing, it did not get the law right ... It did not even get the name of the law right.

This where years of 'no debate' has got them.

Her first version was full of lies. She needs to stop her pity party and grow up.

It is always worth writing in to counteract what is the perceived view at the guardian and to give Susanna Rustin the space to write more on the subject - notably with facts. Who knows maybe eventually Hadley Freeman will be allowed to write on the subject again

All the beardy woke bro’s lap up Zoes disinfo, they’re going a bit quiet though now, bet they’re all starting to feel hoodwinked!