The liklihood of her posting sexually suggestive pictures (the boob shot and domme dress were most certainly captioned suggestively even IF you could somehow argue the content was not) is slim to non. It is simply outside the realms of behaviour most women would engage in.
Lol, I take it you've never logged into fetlife. Actually don't, the day someone from this forum logs into fetlife is the day the internet will probably finally break.
Now. For arguments sake let's say a biological woman DID post a shot hinting at a BDSM session, another offering more than the boobs on show and another toating a gun in a manner that I'm resolute on, is threatening and irresponsible.. she would be hung, drawn, quartered and sacked for the gross misconduct it is.
It is usually women who are targetted for their sexuality in this way I agree which is one reason I oppose this kind of prurient slut shaming. But even the teacher found working as a dominatrix who's online presence was infinitely more explicit and sexual than anything Tulley has posted was only suspended for a year. There have been teachers who did a naked calendar shoot for charity, and whilst it raised some controversy, none were sacked, and none faced hundreds of people writing to their employers accusing them of being a safeguarding risk. This is happening because she's trans. I'm not aware of anyone ever facing a campaign of online harassment like this aimed at their employers because of a couple of slightly risque pics on social media. And if some people have posted messages to her employer accusing her of being a predator or abuser based on such scant evidence, or who have encouraged others to do the same, then that probably could meet the legal criteria for harassment and it is understandable if Girl Guides have felt the need to involve the police. Time will tell whether that is the case.