Person called Phil interviewed today on PM. Phil said that there's an expectation of what his male body should present and this is one thing which made Phil think they is transgender. They disliked expectations on him as 'the man of the house'. They believe that by calling their self non binary, they are resisting the patriarchy. They believe that 'most people' position themselves on one end of the spectrum.
I think most women do not present in the way that a female body 'should' and that is why we have strong feminist movements which object to expectations on us to e.g. be kind, to put our needs aside for others, to be pretty above all else etc. etc. Most of us also resist the patriarchy. I don't know anyone who positions themselves on one end of the spectrum.
This makes me think that we should assume that everyone is 'non-binary' unless they tell us that they accept the patriarchy and are trying to live by the standards patriarchy sets. If we accepted that then pretty much the whole population are non-binary and it's a almost completely irrelevant thing to say. Phil talked about expectations landing on his shoulders when his father died. I think Phil sounded pretty traumatised (as might be expected) but I think it is pretty arrogant nonetheless to assume that most people position themselves on one end of the spectrum. Is there any research which actually suggests this to be true? I think he's making massive assumptions and they are not helpful assumptions particularly to women.
I'd say I'm non-binary except I don't believe we really do have binary conceptualisations of expectations on men and women as they are very time and culture specific.
What do others think?