@DazzlePaintedBattlePants
Is there any way we can shine some sunlight on from Northern Ireland?
You could ask that nice man Stephen Nolan to have a look at the lobbying and process that resulted in Self-ID legislation being shoe-horned in on foot of Marriage Equality (how different could two things be?) with no public debate or discussion. And how the planned legislation was changed at the last minute to go full-on Self-ID with no reference to any medics of any description.
And maybe he could look at the make-up of the group meeting to discuss extending this shit-show to under 18s and magicking up a third gender so we can document the non-binary (civil servants and TEN*).
And while doing that he could question why TEN and their side-kick BeLngT* who have a very specific lobbying agenda have been allowed to present themselves as the go-to "experts" on this issue whether for parents of gender non-conforming kids, schools struggling to work out how to handle all related issues, media, authors of textbooks etc etc etc
And if he had a bit of time left he could look at the machinations of TEN* and whatever is going on in there (including how someone as vitriolic as their now former CEO ever got appointed and allowed to spew bile and advocate violence on SM). And why a national paper would have nominated such a person as "woman" of the year just months after said person arrived in the country so with no track record of doing anything of any merit here (and that's before you discuss the sex of the person).
And maybe a little bit of a poke into their funding and finances.
And then he could look at the documentation and advice that the likes of BeLngT are bringing into schools and whether it is legal (never mind ethically acceptable) to advocated secrecy from parents.
And the fucking nuttery of the DoE suggesting all school toilets should be unisex.
And then he could turn his attention to the HSE and the attempts to remove the word woman from health related literature (though no need to look at the men's health related literature of course), the contrived use of the phrase "pregnant people" etc etc etc
And then he could look at whether there are any sex-based protections for women given our inability to use the word "sex" in legislation leading to a load of mixed up gendery shite. And finally he could have a look at the implications of a review of our equality legislation which plans to add gender identity and gender expression to gender thus ensuring that women have all semblance of sex-based protections erased.
Now I'm happy for anyone else who is interested to shine a light on all and any of this but it strikes me that he might have the balls to do it because nobody in media this side of the border seems to.
So if you can get light shone please do because we are sitting in the pitch black and it is terrifying.