@Gasp0deTheW0nderD0g
Are we allowed to use the phrase 'sacred caste' nowadays? There's a strong whiff of it here. Interesting that the mother in the DM article is adamant that her son is not transgender. Sounds as if the school jumped to that conclusion and didn't discuss with her. Par for the course.
Nope, not at all.
Under current TRA propaganda
Your conclusions showed you need to "do👏🏻 better👏🏻"
The school was "trans ally" by having an "acceptance without exception" policy and would be "transphobic" to ask the male child for "her pronouns" if female apparel clearly demonstrates a "gender identity".
The male in the female apparel "is trans" and correctly accessing the female bathrooms.
However if the parent is unaware this is due to "transphobia" of parent attempting to "erase her existence".
The school being "trans allies" have protected the male from "her mother's transphobic violence" and correctly allowed the male a "safe space" by not challenging the parents assumption.
Which works, except when the sexual assault derails the underlying social engineering / mixed sex bathroom agenda.
The school has a financial liability for lack of supervision. The male committed sexual assault on the premises he had a prior history of inappropriate sexual contact with 10 yr old female student and physical violence.
The liability is slightly mitigated if the male was trespassing into an area rather than there by permission of the school.
Luckily in a neat squared circle, with the new policy he wont gain permission without self IDing as trans either.
If I was the mother I would be selling the "not transgender" as hard as I could. A child committing sexual assault on other children is a horrible reality but being the poster-child of trans rapist is a whole other level of notorious.
Plus on a local level its toxic with the State arresting parents at school meetings. The TRS lobby group is willing to bankrupt the parent of a rape victim for bring their ideology into disrepute what would they do to the family of the perpetrator?
The legal team is, I presume, still trying to negotiate a sentence recommendation with the person (elected official?) who personally prosecuted a father for being upset that his child was sexually assaulted while in the care of the school.