"The fact that Sarah's righteous anger
amounted to a crime is a limp excuse for herexclusion. I don't condone incitement of any harm either, but the steps taken have been highly questionable. The magazine includes contributions from those including members of the judiciary who are known among critical circles for failing to enfranchise one of the
most ostracised groups in society i.e.
transwomen. Your comments about single
sex spaces form part of that tradition of
ostracism, and whilst I appreciate you say you are just learning (we all are) I can't in good conscience contribute to a publication
founded on these principles."
twitter.com/rebell_justice/status/1427954825451474946?s=19
I'm sorry but what an absolute, bleeding-heart TWAT.
This person is provably violent and dangerous. "Righteous anger" my arse (isn't this always the way they justify TRA threats, if they acknowledge they happen at all?)?
And "most ostracised' (is that another way of saying 'most marginalised'?). Are they fuck!
If anyone is "still learning", it's this pompous windbag of a solicitor. Although if a violent, convicted felon can't persuade them that something is a bit off here, what the fuck could?