@SmokedDuck
Oops - posted too soon. When we consider that fetish, by definition, tends to mean that a person often will not be able to have a very satisfying "normal" sex life, I think it becomes questionable that it isn't harmful, at least to the person involved.
Totally agree. Bang on. The question is, does the activity fall within SSC and RACK? Can both parties fall within giving to each other Positive Informed Consent? That is key.
I had to google what the term meant.
Here is the definition
Autogynephilia is defined as a male's propensity to be sexually aroused by the thought of himself as a female. It is the paraphilia that is theorized to underlie transvestism and some forms of male-to-female (MtF) transsexualism
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22005209/#:~:text=Autogynephilia%20is%20defined%20as%20a,%2Dfemale%20(MtF)%20transsexualism.
It is labelled as a paraphilia. Other paraphilas (NOT fets) are incest, bestiality. Paedophilia.
Used to run Kink events in London. It was always the cross-dressers who gave me the headache. Always. Not just me but other female kink organisers had to deal with these cretins. They were attempting to get into female only safe spaces running the argument that if we didn't let them in then we are being transphobic. No were were not. We had zero tolerance for abusers. Even then, we bent over backwards for these losers.
And yes, we can talk about how being 'female' impacts on our lives. The girl I was in 1995 thought that I could do anything. In 2022, all I see is our rights as female are being quietly dissembled. To the point where an semi-epsilon won a beauty contest in America looking like the back end of a route master.
Anyway. Us, females need to fight for our right not to be cancelled. We are half of homo sapiens. Half.