It’s hard enough for Middle Age women to discuss it with each other as we have been socialised to just get on with it. Our mothers didn’t talk about it.
This. This is key.
What all these people who are accepting the use of dehumanised language as replacement and not additive (and I know many women will also not accept the additive language either) is that many of us have experienced already the dehumanisation.
The fact that very few of us discuss it with our friends or even our sisters or mothers is that this issue HAS always been dehumanised.
None of us want to discuss it with males in the group. And very few will want to attend a group using terminology like 'those with a womb'. That is not even accurate for a good percentage of women going through menopause even.
Does people honestly think that using the term 'people with wombs' is appropriate to menopausal women? What about those without a womb? Do they have to go somewhere else?
Once you pull one thread ... more unravels. But that is what is happening with 'this' type of inclusion. It is not being well done at all.