It is because like the Death Cafe model it is about inclusion to discuss a subject that is often thought of as taboo and not discussed openly. If we don’t invite men into this conversation that we will continue to think we need to hide away our ‘women’s problems’ as if they are something that men shouldn’t be troubled with. In allowing men to join we are inviting them to understand how difficult the menopause can be for many women and to open up the conversation. As I said it would be a brave man to join for the wrong reasons. If they thought it was a good idea to come along and snigger in the side lines about women discussing their vaginas they really wouldn’t last 2 seconds and would soon be wanting to leave 🤣.
I just felt sad about the tone of this comment. I understand that they are not discriminating or anti trans but knowing trans people who find life very difficult I felt it was not very supportive. Of course we would not police words people could use.
“I don’t mind who wants to go along to an event as long as the content of the event and the language used doesn’t end up being policed, with “menopausal women” replaced by “menopausal people” and “vaginal atrophy” becoming “front hole atrophy” etc.
I wouldn’t dream of going along to an event specifically set up to talk about the needs of those who’ve been through ‘sex reassignment surgery’ and insist they use only words that I deem suitable, so as long as there’s none of that bullshit and the menopausal and peri women in attendance are able to speak freely about their own experiences in relation to their female sexed bodies, fine. The minute there was a whiff of the trans agenda taking over I’d be out of there in a shot“