Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Tavistock gender clinic ‘converting’ gay children

56 replies

NonnyMouse1337 · 20/06/2021 05:08

It's what we all knew but still upsetting to read.

Times article - www.thetimes.co.uk/article/tavistock-gender-clinic-converting-gay-children-tz8cs77p3

Archive link - archive.is/F3Z6m

OP posts:
corkernewyorker · 20/06/2021 06:12

Very upsetting. Thank you for posting.

McDuffy · 20/06/2021 07:13

Just read it, so upsetting Sad

Xiaoxiong · 20/06/2021 07:25

Transing the gay away. Awful Sad this is why we fight - for these kids whose voices are not heard as they are swept along on this pathway.

Ylvamoon · 20/06/2021 07:31

That's really sad.

But I am a firm believer that we shouldn't meddle with hormones and gender 're assignment anyway

Catinaflap · 20/06/2021 09:06

The archive link's not working for me, anyone got a share token?

Cabinfever10 · 20/06/2021 09:14

I'm glad that this is coming out but that article is WRONG the Bell decision DID NOT ban puberty blockers in the UK only England and Wales, the Sandford clinic in Scotland is still prescribing them.

Zeev · 20/06/2021 09:18

It is what we've been saying for years. Good to see it in print.

NotBadConsidering · 20/06/2021 09:31

@Cabinfever10

I'm glad that this is coming out but that article is WRONG the Bell decision DID NOT ban puberty blockers in the UK only England and Wales, the Sandford clinic in Scotland is still prescribing them.
And it didn’t ban them, it said they could still get them if they could convince a judge they understood the 8 points of consent.
vivariumvivariumsvivaria · 20/06/2021 09:44

It is quite tough to read that. We knew it, but, I'm thinking about my DD's friends who have gone from apple cheeked, freckle faced toddlers to sullen teens in the blink of an eye. Three of her social circle are on testosterone. I'd not have been surprised if those kids had come out as lesbian and DD thinks it is now seen as shameful to be a lesbian, that it means you are denying the truth of your transgenderism.

BernardBlackMissesLangCleg · 20/06/2021 09:54

god that's awful. in their rush to experiment on children they just ignored any inconvenient back stories, didn't they?

Whatwouldscullydo · 20/06/2021 10:10

I really don't know how many times this needs to be said or written about for people to twig.

So many children have been failed it makes you sick to think about those poor kids

YellowFish12 · 20/06/2021 10:15

Thank you for the share token

HidingFromTheChildren · 20/06/2021 10:24

There is a definite link between parental issues and homosexuality. Nobody likes to admit it however.

Whatstheweatherlike · 20/06/2021 10:36

Thank you for sharing, I agree it's upsetting to read. I'd love to know how Stonewall are going to stand up in support of these LGB children given the information that is coming to light directly from psychologists (previously) working at the clinic.

ArabellaScott · 20/06/2021 10:51

Thank you. Upsetting, stark but very clear headline.

toffeebutterpopcorn · 20/06/2021 10:54

Well well well. If only someone had been pointing this out all along... oh wait, we were...

Cabinfever10 · 20/06/2021 11:01

@Whatstheweatherlike
I wouldn't expect Stonewall to do anything as they can't even admit that homosexuality (ie same sex attraction) exists its same gender attraction now according to them

Whatstheweatherlike · 20/06/2021 11:20

I agree and that's heartbreaking. Here we have professionals saying they are seeing LGB children coming to them having experienced bullying that must be so traumatic for them that they think changing their whole identity is the only solution. Why has this not been explored and challenged? Sad

NecessaryScene · 20/06/2021 11:22

"Because gender identity has nothing to do with sexuality!!!"

(Insert rainbow emojis, gender unicorns etc).

archery2 · 20/06/2021 11:34

It is true that the judicial review judgment did not ban the use of puberty blockers in under 16s. Firstly, it merely set a high bar to obtain consent, rather than imposing a ban; secondly, the judgment is not implemented, pending the appeal. But in effect it did temporarily halt the use of puberty blockers, because in response to the judgment, NHS England issued an emergency change to the service specification for GIDS which caused GIDS to halt referrals to UCLH while they undertook a review of existing contents.

Datun · 20/06/2021 11:52

It's interesting that they're using the word converting.

Conversion therapy is well understood in terms of homosexuality. But Stonewall were pushing for it to be applied to transgenderism. Which meant that you would have to affirm a child in their transgender identity lest you be accused of conversion therapy.

It would appear that no one is buying that application.

rogdmum · 20/06/2021 12:03

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

NecessaryScene · 20/06/2021 12:10

@rogdmum - do you have a link to the full statement?

rogdmum · 20/06/2021 12:44

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.