I read the article early today and was both angry and sad.
Just think, if Stonewall had stuck with it original purpose of protecting the rights of same sex attracted people they could have played a positive role in how young people referred to GIDs or whever, to act as voice and champion the fact that being lesbian or gay is perfectly all right.
And would fit their brief of being opposed to conversion therapy of lesbians and gays.
But now here they are aiding and abetting conversion therapy, and getting funding to do it.
(Just to say that some of the Times news articles aren't behind a paywall, for instance this one and the one about Liz Truss. And just wish all the ones the published about women's sex based rights were not behing pay wall so that many more can read them given the deluge of pro trans acticles published each day.)