[quote NecessaryScene1]It makes it look as if something is being done to bring the male athlete down to the level of a comparable female but in practice it doesn’t actually do that as the scientific research shows.
But this is what many orgs have as their current policy, following the IOC's lead, which was based (entirely?) on one very sketchy paper by Harper.
That was extremely obviously flawed at the time, and lots of following work has being done which shows clearly that the male advantage is not negated by testosterone suppression.
The reviews by Hilton & Lundberg, and a new review by Harper, both are quite conclusive.
(Still find it hard to say "Hilton" all seriously, rather than "FondOfBeetles"...
It's weird being in a community where people start off anonymous then gradually decloak and turn out to be key researchers).
Emma's thread on the two papers:
twitter.com/FondOfBeetles/status/1368174222992961547[/quote]
So when the extremely poor quality evidence says transwomen can compete in women's sport they follow it, but when the much higher quality new evidence says its unfair and unsafe, they ignore it (except World Rugby).
Why?