Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

My statement in the House of Lords today

668 replies

Glinner · 09/03/2021 19:32

(At least I got it on the record. No-one will ever be able to say I didn't try to fight this crap).

My name is Graham Linehan, I am a writer. I’ve written several comedy programmes, the best-known of which is probably ‘Father Ted’ but I’d ask you today to briefly take me seriously because I believe the stakes could not be higher.

Almost four years ago I saw that feminists were being bullied, harassed and silenced for standing up for their rights and their children's rights. I decided to use my platform on Twitter to bring attention to what seemed to be an all-out assault on women, on their words, their dignity and their safety. Also, I saw that vulnerable children were being fast-tracked onto a medical pathway that carried severe long-term implications. My position is very simple. I believe everyone should be allowed to talk about these issues. In fact, I believe it is a moral imperative that we do so.

I am talking about such matters as... the scandals at the Tavistock, the confusing and misleading advice that Stonewall has been providing to institutions all over the UK regarding the nature of the equalities act, the issue of men in women’s sports, in women’s prisons, their rape crisis centres, the destruction of basic safeguarding principles that has led to all this, and the silencing and abuse of feminists, doctors, teachers, academics and writersanyone, in factwho questions the fashionable American orthodoxy of gender identity ideology.

For engaging in this debate, I have been the subject of a series of harassment campaigns, including vexatious legal actions, police visits, magazine articles misrepresenting my positions, threatening letters hand-delivered to my home, my wife’s business address released online...anything and everything has been tried to silence me and prevent people from hearing the reasonable fears many women have about the impact of this ideology on their sex-based rights. I have also lost work. As a result of my sudden financial insecurity, my marriage was placed under such a severe strain that my wife and I finally agreed to separate.

Believe me, I would rather be writing a farce than living through one. But this is a very dangerous farce, one in which children's health and happiness are gambled on an ideology that makes no sense, and yet is zealously and obsessively policed by misogynistic activists on platforms that empower them just as they disempower the women they abuse.

But it’s not just the platforms or their users who are preventing a debate. Around three years ago, I was among the initial signatories of a letter to Stonewall asking them to help lower the toxicity of the conversation around sex and gender and acknowledge the plurality of views on the subject. The letter was composed by Jonny Best, a gay man and longtime LGBT activist, and the majority of these initial signatories were either gay, lesbian or trans.

We wanted to see an end to women receiving death and rape threats for standing up for their sex-based rights. To that end, we asked Stonewall to commit to fostering an atmosphere of respectful debate, rather than demonising as transphobic those who wished to discuss or dissent from Stonewall’s current policies. Stonewall flatly refused this appeal within the day, and continued to dishonestly frame women standing up for their rights as an attack on trans rights. The petition has since been signed by over 11,000 people, many of them gay men and women in despair at what is being done in their name.

JK Rowling is only the latest and most high-profile figure to suffer the consequences of this fundamentalist view of the issue-- the magazine Pink News, which is partly funded by Google, ran 42 stories on her in a single week, that’s six stories a day. But there are thousands more women, who are bullied and slandered and harassed into silence. These women – and they are mostly women – are not famous and so even more vulnerable to the smear campaigns and targeted harassment that JK Rowling and myself have endured.

And to briefly pause here, does anyone present know what JK Rowling said that was transphobic? Can anyone produce any transphobic statements by her? You cannot, because there are none. As a survivor of domestic abuse, she wrote movingly about the importance of single-sex spaces to vulnerable women and children, she complained about the erasure of the word ’woman’ in many areas of civic life, and she pointed out, correctly in my view, that we are living through the misogynistic period we have ever experienced.

In place of evidence of her supposed transphobia, we have hundreds if not thousands of youtube stars, Twitter trolls, mainstream media outletsincluding the BBC spreading a poisonous lie intended to blacken her name and serve as a warning to the women who might otherwise find the courage to echo her concerns.

This silencing of women was the main reason I entered this fight. I knew the subject of gender was fraught but I’m political by nature and I couldn’t remain quiet in the face of such vicious misogyny. I presumed that when others saw what was happening that they too would speak up and we would be able to force the debate our opponents were so desperate to avoid.

I now realise that I was up against a much bigger beast than I thought. These platforms shape the debate and declare you untouchable when you refuse to play by their rules. The upshot is that many people presume that I am a bigot. These people also presume the same of JK Rowling and many other left-leaning, liberal and progressive women.

If you believe that JK Rowling is transphobic, a woman who has devoted her work and much of her fortune to the vulnerable, the bullied, the forgotten and the abused, then you are under a spell. If you believe that men can fairly compete against women in their sportsincluding contact sports then you are under a spell. If you believe that men will not go to the most extreme lengths to gain access to women and children, then you are under a spell. If you believe that children as young as three years old can agree to a procedure that puts them on a medical pathway for life, that arrests their natural puberty, and that has almost no scientific proof as to its efficacy as a treatment for dysphoria, then you are under a spell.

Social media has created a through the looking glass world which is robbing everyone of their ability to think. My final statement on Twitter, the straw that broke the camel’s back, was simply “Men are not women.” A world where statements like “Men are not women” is hate speech is a world on the brink of chaos. Feminists are just the canary in the coalmine in this upside-down world where public discourse depends on the whims of a small group of men in Silicon Valley. Gender identity ideology began in American Universities, is uncritically disseminated by the popular media, but social media companies and their users are the enforcers.

People do not understand the extent to which they have been indoctrinated by this ideology. Women who oppose it are trying desperately to be heard. Helen, who is here with me today is only one example of thousands. I have heard from young lesbians who are frightened that their sexuality will have them labelled transphobic, I have heard from therapists unable to tell distraught children that their favourite author does not want them dead, I’ve heard from detransitioners who tell of young women being groomed by older men in trans youth groups.

The reason you have not heard the things that I have heard is that the discourse is being shaped by trans rights activists. In place of reasoned arguments and democratic discussion, we have mantras like “No debate” and “Transwomen are women”, we have policies passing by stealth, we have bogus statistics about trans murder epidemics and we have the unconscionable weaponising of suicide for political ends.

The discourse is broken. Women’s rights are being stripped away, our children are not safe, and we are not allowed to talk about it.

Once again, thank you for giving us the opportunity to address this today and I would be happy to answer any questions that you have.

OP posts:
notveryhappyhere · 10/03/2021 11:44

I read loads too. I don’t post because I’m not very articulate and I’m quite in awe of a lot of you! I love this board ❤️

MrsBobDylan · 10/03/2021 12:27

I worked in the public sector for 20 years and was silenced by Stonewall and trans activists from thinking about my own rights as a woman.

When I left two years ago, I discovered this board and all the brilliant people advocating for women's rights and realised that women's right were being wiped away.

I am not brave but just listening to your courage and conviction, despite what it has cost you personally and professionally, a duty to support, speak out and challenge.

Thank you so much.

P.S One of my sons has a learning disability and his head teacher calls him the love child of Father Jack and Catherine Tate's Nan. He is a comedy genius, if ever you need some comedic inspiration, please just let me know Grin

MishyJDI · 10/03/2021 12:30

Graham - you simply lessen your arguments when you do stuff like this photo. It comes across as ridiculing trans people, and strengthens their hand against you.

Perhaps seek to build bridges, and don't get over consumed by all of this, as it comes across as bitterness, and I am sure you are better than that.

My statement in the House of Lords today
Coffeeandcocopops · 10/03/2021 12:35

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

RozWatching · 10/03/2021 12:39

@ChattyLion

Posting here because I hope you’ll see this Glinner and I don’t know how to contact Helen Staniland. I think it could be relevant to your evidence session yesterday. The UK government are advertising their first ever showcase event about ‘using tech to keep online communities safer’ coming up on 24 March.

cogx.live/events/safety-tech-2021/

www.gov.uk/government/news/world-first-safety-tech-expo-to-feature-speakers-from-lego-youtube-riot-ea-and-more

Firstly there is no women’s experience speaker I can spot so that is a massive gap in identifying what the problem looks like.
Secondly solutions shouldn’t be about shutting down speech further, but about having very clear lines about what is legally acceptable speech and what is acceptable on each platform without creating an equalities problem around unequal freedom of expression between men and women on each particular platform.

It can’t be fair that companies’ own policies = women will be banned because they post about women’s rights.

The state needs to legally regulate so that companies have clear lines about mass reporting, and provide transparency about who makes the decisions to sanction or ban posters as Helen and you said in your evidence to the committee yesterday. There’s other issues too- What can women do right now about being sent sexually graphic and violent images, threats, doxxing etc etc when the platforms themselves don’t do anything about them. Will these new tech solutions change anything around that? And so on.

Could you contact the organisers and offer to send a speaker? Reading between the lines this looks like the government supporting tech solutions to online harassment but without first having had the principled discussion with users about what the new tech will actually be used for or what acceptable disagreement online looks like. We have to get a consensus on that otherwise surely there’ll just be even more silencing of women and an even greater lack of transparency about how it’s being done systematically because it will be instantaneous and automated.

They say: ‘The Expo will set out a compelling vision for how technology can be used in a positive way to create value for brands and safer online experiences for users, by helping companies detect and address potentially harmful content or behaviour.’

Also ‘Safety Tech 2021 will reveal how technology can be used to help companies tackle the growing levels of toxicity that see one in five people abandon online games and social platforms. This can include hate speech, disinformation, grooming, harassment and advocacy of suicide or self-harm. It includes sessions aimed at CEOs, technologists, designers, marketing leads and regulatory compliance leads.

Sponsored by the UK Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) and Department for International Trade (DIT), the event adds further momentum to the growing global cross-sector movement for online safety.

Tickets for this free event, which takes place on Wednesday 24 March at 15:30 - 18:00 GMT can be found on the CogX website.’

Good spot, Chatty.

Paging @Glinner and Helen

LaVitaPuoEsserePiuBella · 10/03/2021 12:40

Absolutely brilliant, Graham. Thank you from the bottom of my heart for speaking out. The extract above from 1984 that someone has posted is chillingly spot on.
I want a world for my teen DD where she can access single-sex spaces for women without fear.
I am going to subscribe to Substack immediately.
PS I watched your Newsnight interview with Sarah Smith - she was like a bulldog, and utterly, clearly biased against you. Her initials are interesting...

gellico · 10/03/2021 13:07

Could someone explain the coffee buying thing for me please, or send me a DM if it's not allowed on here? Thank you.

Wondermule · 10/03/2021 13:10

Sorry one more thing Graham, the last few years in particular must have been incredibly stressful for you, please do take time out if you feel you need it, this is very much a marathon! We will all still be here doing what we can. Thank you again ☕️

PatsArrow · 10/03/2021 13:13

gellico it's a way of supporting someone with a small financial bung (as little as £3). For that you get to see content that they post. Many artists and creators do it. It's a way of supporting without necessarily signing up to subscription, although you can do that if you wish.

For me, it's almost symbolic. Hell yes, I'll buy you a drink!

BoeotianNightmare · 10/03/2021 13:30

Haven't read all the comments but I'm welling up reading your statement @glinner

Thank you

gellico · 10/03/2021 13:38

Thanks @PatsArrow I've got the link now. I've not come across this before. What a good idea.

Glinner · 10/03/2021 13:52

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Glinner · 10/03/2021 14:00

There's also this very good point

twitter.com/_freetodisagree/status/1369647657833095169?s=20

OP posts:
CousinKrispy · 10/03/2021 14:27

Thank you Graham, and thanks to Helen.

tiktok · 10/03/2021 14:33

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

HappyInL0nd0n · 10/03/2021 14:35

Thank you, Glinner. Sincerely. I'm a child sexual abuse & incest survivor. This all matters very much. And I say that with warmth & openness to all the lovely trans folk who just want to get on with their lives in peace without infringing on some very important protections designed to safeguard girls and women. Thanks

Impatiens · 10/03/2021 14:40

@MishyJDI

Graham - you simply lessen your arguments when you do stuff like this photo. It comes across as ridiculing trans people, and strengthens their hand against you.

Perhaps seek to build bridges, and don't get over consumed by all of this, as it comes across as bitterness, and I am sure you are better than that.

Mushy, can you explain why that it isn't seen as 'ridiculing' trans people for Philip Bunce/Eddie Izzard to claim they are women on some days and not others? Or why it's considered fine for Alex Drummond to have a beard and makeup combination?
Impatiens · 10/03/2021 14:41

*Mishy

OnlyTheLangoftheTitBerg · 10/03/2021 14:58

Thank you for standing up for women and children, Graham. Please take care of yourself; the abuse and vilification from the self-styled and oh-so-hypocritical “be kind” brigade takes its toll on the strongest of us.

Cagedbirdsinging · 10/03/2021 15:04

'What is the difference between me and Alok here except make-up looks better on me ?'
This is a very interesting question and to answer it I think one has to apply the Dougal Principle of Non Comparative Determinants, viz: This one is small but those ones are very far away .

Wondermule · 10/03/2021 15:06

@MishyJDI

Graham - you simply lessen your arguments when you do stuff like this photo. It comes across as ridiculing trans people, and strengthens their hand against you.

Perhaps seek to build bridges, and don't get over consumed by all of this, as it comes across as bitterness, and I am sure you are better than that.

Mishy, every tool box needs a hammer. Do you think any of this would make it into the news if the movement was solely composed of faceless middle aged women? Of course not. And we need some light relief amongst all the mindfuckery we have to put up with every day. We can bombard our MPs with as many letters as we want, for more people to become aware of this insidious damage, we need people like @Glinner and JK to raise the public awareness. And I am extremely grateful to them as they have become the ‘face’ (aka target for abuse) in order to do that.
Uhohmummy · 10/03/2021 15:08

Thank you Graham, for standing up for women and children. I too am very sorry for how much this fight has cost you. My daughters and I are very grateful.

TheChampagneGalop · 10/03/2021 15:09

Glinner Thank you for standing up for women.
And as someone who have used the dating app Her in the past, and stopped since it's no longer for women only, your parody was spot-on.

Fluffyhairforever · 10/03/2021 15:20

Thank you, Graham.

Pudmyboy · 10/03/2021 15:20

Thank you Graham, like others here I had no idea you had given (and lost) so much. I do hope things get better for you, and you can go back to making me cry with laughter again. Flowers