I think it's important to actually see the stats differences between sexual orientation and gender identity. I don't think the link in the op highlights this at all. Sexual orientation and gender reassignment are poles apart, yet conflated to be one and the same. They really aren't.
I agree that it would be harmful for conversion therapy to be applied to sexual orientation. However I think sex reassignment is deeply homophobic and seeks to convert children physically with consequences that will impact on the rest of their lives. Those consequences range from breast removal, genital surgery, high risk of stroke, hear disease and brittle bones. With such consequences it is imperative that the right checks and balances are in place.
It is essential therefore for children who seek gender reassignment to undergo counselling and a watchful waiting process, to ensure they understand the serious physical consequences of gender reassignment and are able to weigh them up. This is the centre of safeguarding.
It seems to me sex reassignment conversion therapy and sexual orientation conversion therapy are two entirely different things that have been deliberately conflated.
Sexual orientation harms no one and there is no need for conversion therapy. Sex reassignment however can seriously physically harm the individual involved. For this reason people need to be given an opportunity to explore this much further, and the reasons behind it, before making physical life altering changes.
But it's obvious that the two things have been deliberately conflated. James kirkup sums up neatly the tactic of attaching the T to the LGB in order to get ahead of government policy to push their agenda through, whilst hiding in the shadows.
www.spectator.co.uk/article/the-document-that-reveals-the-remarkable-tactics-of-trans-lobbyists/amp?__twitter_impression=true&s=08