[quote DadJoke]@Notoriouslynotnotious
I don't think a campaigner against genital mutiliation should exactly be target number one for people who want language which is inclusive trans men. There are many better causes, and more transphobic individuals. Likewise, it surprises me that GC feminists spend so much of their time and energy against a tiny group of marginalised people, when there are other, more important issues to address.
Yes, it's trans exclusionary women rather than trans exlusionary men who get more attacked, and misogyny is at play there.[/quote]
You express surprise that we spend so much time arguing against the doctrine of gender identity (not against trans people per se), while providing us with evidence of why that is a vital part of our fight for women's rights.
Hibo has zero interest in trans issues. She has no issues with trans people. Proponents of the doctrine of gender identity have attacked her - not the other way round. That's because FGM has nothing to do with gender identity and everything to do with sex. Explicitly with the sexual function of female people. There is no overlap with trans issues. None.
And I think her response to that self-absorbed, coldhearted individual was much more polite than that person could expect. She simply declined to entertain their inconsiderate, asinine notion that a campaigner against a horrific human rights violation inflicted almost exclusively on girls in African, Middle Eastern and Asian countries ought to adjust her language so as not to upset the tender sensibilities of a minute number of Anglo-American females, who have neither suffered FGM nor campaign against it.
I'd have told that callous twit to FOTTFEOF and then fuck off some more once she got there.
But then again, Hibo is a much better person than me.