The BBC is pushing an adult trans activist agenda onto children

[stumbledin]

All BBC programming and content directed towards children and young people on the subject of transgender pushes an extreme adult, political trans activist agenda.

The Mail has reported on the notorious BBC Teach episode that teaches children there are over 100 ‘gender identities’ including ‘male’ and ‘female.’ Despite all the complaints, the episode is still up and children are still viewing it.

We have been writing to the BBC and we thought this would be a good time to openly share our latest letter.

Continues at www.transgendertrend.com/bbc-adult-trans-activist-agenda-children/

(Sorry if this has already been posted)

How are there over 100 gender identities exactly?

Maybe the BBC can tell us..

They can have as many genders as there are stars in the sky. Still just 2 sexes though.

And I think they often mean "personality" when they spout nonsense about genders.

To be honest , having so many genders makes life easier because there is then no reason to consider them related to sex at all , no one will have a hundred different types of loo

There was once a man on the BBC One Show saying there were 7 billion genders which made me think it was actually personalities we were talking about but then I felt sorry for the o other approx 1.5 billion people who didn't have their personalities or 'genders' recognised.

Imagine the pronouns.

I've got an idea for pronouns then... we could use names ...midge got midges book from midges shelf

Nick Ferrari is covering this in the next hour (he said later in the show and the presenters usually promote the next hour segment)

Transgender Trend have been working so hard to expose all this and they get no funding whatsoever. There are only a few days left on their appeal for funds, so please consider donating - every bit counts.

@midgebabe

To be honest , having so many genders makes life easier because there is then no reason to consider them related to sex at all , no one will have a hundred different types of loo

Sadly there will be just one 'all gender' loo as noone can provide 100 loos. Lots of places are doing this anyway.

Brilliant letter! Thank you for writing it and for sharing it here.

@EvenleyWitch

How are there over 100 gender identities exactly?

Maybe the BBC can tell us..

Perhaps watch it and find out ;) ha ha

This is excellent. I'm sick of them constantly shoving drag at me, apparently with no idea that many, many women find men dressing up as spiteful parodies of women profoundly insulting. And the BBC are leading and pushing this. I think I'm going to be writing a personal letter to Tim Davie this afternoon. My licence fee is due in a couple of months and I'll have to discuss with my partner whether we want to pay it or not. I use the BBC less and less so removing player from our laptops and phones won't a big deal.

DC are banned from BBC/CBBC/CBeebies exactly because of this. Refuse to even let them look at the bite size school work on there, there’s much better businesses out there for children, BBC has long since proven they've not got children’s interests at heart.

It is quite a loss though because only a few years ago BBC children’s programmes were the best and most trusted by a long way. The pushing of gender ideology on children has wiped that all out.

How far the mighty have fallen!

@Cuntysnark

Nick Ferrari is covering this in the next hour (he said later in the show and the presenters usually promote the next hour segment)

Well that was a non discussion really! Who on Earth was that rep from Stonewall, stuttering and spluttering, unable to succinctly define "gender queer" to Nick Ferrari? And stonewall wants these "gender identities" defined in law?! How exactly? Nick was more concerned with not offending the person, when he should have been properly calling out the utter nonsense of it all. Pointless piece, totally missed the chance to highlight the disgusting indoctrination being carried out by the BBC. I'm furious. I really hope Transgender Trend can get through to them.

Oh so true, my teens grew up with CBeebies and CBBC but I won’t let my primary school aged child near it.

The Beeb is busy shooting itself in the foot just as the other providers are walking in and stamping all over the things they used to do well (drama, radio, news). All because they can’t establish their key market isn’t interested in watching modern blackface.

They should take note of Marks and Spencers demise due to ruffles and stupid embellishments.

That letter is excellent. It explains the concerns clearly and rationally.

My understanding is the trans advocacy groups campaign to get trans children to transition early because the outcome (passability I guess?) is better when started younger. This would of course require puberty blockers and eventually hormone treatment, and that's where the GC side has major concerns. How can be a child give consent to such life-changing decisions and medication? And with a figure of 80%+ of children with gender disphoria growing out of it naturally, there shouldn't be a push for medication at all while they are under-age.

It is very much an adult agenda, dangerous and misleading for children.

Well done Transgender Trend for repeatedly focusing on how this ideology harms children. The way the BBC enables adults with a personal interest in this agenda to target children via children's programming is reprehensible.
Long overdue for this embarrassing and inappropriate programme to be removed.

My understanding is the trans advocacy groups campaign to get trans children to transition early because the outcome (passability I guess?) is better when started younger.

And this only applies to boys, since it is testosterone that causes the irreversible effects which stop them from 'passing'. There is no similar 'benefit' for girls taking hormone blockers during puberty, yet the majority of GIDS patients are now girls.

Thank-you Stephanie and Transgender Trend for continuing to challenge this nonsense

@OldCrone

My understanding is the trans advocacy groups campaign to get trans children to transition early because the outcome (passability I guess?) is better when started younger.

And this only applies to boys, since it is testosterone that causes the irreversible effects which stop them from 'passing'. There is no similar 'benefit' for girls taking hormone blockers during puberty, yet the majority of GIDS patients are now girls.

Do puberty blockers, when given to girls, halt breast development or affect reproductive organs?

@OldCrone

My understanding is the trans advocacy groups campaign to get trans children to transition early because the outcome (passability I guess?) is better when started younger.

And this only applies to boys, since it is testosterone that causes the irreversible effects which stop them from 'passing'. There is no similar 'benefit' for girls taking hormone blockers during puberty, yet the majority of GIDS patients are now girls.

I have yet to see anyone make any case for any benefit specifically for girls who go on puberty blockers before cross-sex hormones.

I have seen people suggest that the girls have less breast tissue to remove should they go on to have surgery, but less is not none, and the surgery is still required.

My understanding is the trans advocacy groups campaign to get trans children to transition early because the outcome (passability I guess?) is better when started younger.

Actually I think the main point of their campaigning is to get everyone to accept the notion of "trans children".

I know it's common these days to assume that "trans" is a pre-existing condition that results in a need for surgery, hormones, etc, but this is completely at odds with the etymology of the word. Go back a few decades, and a person acquired the attribute "trans" (short for transsexual) by undergoing transition (ie surgery).

The pre-existing condition is dysphoria/dysmorphia. Kids with this condition are not "trans" (though some will go on to become so).

What they're campaigning for now is to ensure all children with dysphoria become transsexual.

As for puberty blockers for girls, so far as I know they prevent girls from reaching their full adult potential height. In other words: less likely to pass.

Thanks ^^

I wasn't agreeing in any way with trans ideology, just wanting to see if I was understanding their position.

Why isn't a better solution to just let people wear clothes, have hobbies, have any preference of hair or makeup without it defining or confirming a gender identity? It's a much less intrusive way of letting children develop.