Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Private Eye article on Jolyon Maugham

16 replies

Fauchelevant · 07/01/2021 16:15

mobile.twitter.com/CroneInAMillion/status/1346809384190562312

Photo of article on the Twitter link.

OP posts:
Socrates11 · 07/01/2021 16:51

That is a great piece, proper skewers the pompous prat. Good ole Private Eye.

SpiderGwen · 07/01/2021 16:53

They’ve been great on this issue.

SunsetBeetch · 07/01/2021 19:56

That's brilliant. I didn't know of his targeting of PestFix. What a nasty piece of work. He's got some kind of Crusader Complex (I think that's the technical term Smile ).

Namechange2020lalala · 07/01/2021 20:01

Never will get over his zeal at bludgeoning a fox to death last year.

Al1langdownthecleghole · 07/01/2021 21:30

Oh, that's a joy to read.

dyslek · 09/01/2021 09:04

The guy sounds unhinged. A very small amount of public attention seems to have gone compleatly to his head.

Tho it is always funny to see posh people losing the plot and acting the fool in public.

ItsLateHumpty · 09/01/2021 23:33

“... born again trans-rights activist” Grin

Private Eye article on Jolyon Maugham
Manderleyagain · 09/01/2021 23:57

Do you think he's blocked the private eye account on twitter?

nettie434 · 10/01/2021 10:18

It amused me that the PPE company he objected to is called PestFix, especially when lots of farmers and hen keepers think that foxes are pests. He has his own methods of fixing 'pests'!

Tina7890 · 11/01/2021 14:54

What a terrible article. From what I've read and seen Maugham seems to be upholding everything this article claims he's against. PestFix should rightly be questioned especially given its owners links to the Conservative party, certainly makes you wonder how a firm with no experience in PPE can be given millions of our tax money.

Clymene · 11/01/2021 14:59

Is that you Jolly?

InTheShadowOfTheMushroomCloud · 11/01/2021 15:23

@Clymene

Is that you Jolly?
🦊🦊🦊🦊🦊🦊🦊🦊🦊🦊🦊🦊🦊🦊
Socrates11 · 20/01/2021 21:50

Lol, read it again to check why I thought it was a good article. Arguing that judges are in no position to tell families how to behave is not a good look for someone in the law profession & quite rightly his conduct should be investigated by the Bar Standards Council.

umpteennamechanges · 20/01/2021 21:54

It does all seem to have gone to his head.

I unfollowed him immediately after fox-gate.

Ihaventgottimeforthis · 20/01/2021 21:57

Government procurement contracts should indeed be challenged & examined for corruption & fraud & I definitely support that happening whether its the Good Law Project or others; JM's conduct on twitter is a completely different issue particularly if he is targeting & harassing individuals & companies & bringing his sector into disrepute. I remember seeing that tweet about parents knowing what's best for their kids & thinking he surely does not believe that bollocks.

everythingcrossed · 20/01/2021 22:49

JM gets a brief mention in the (startlingly good, no punches pulled) review of Irreversible Damage in the latest issue. Spoiler: the reviewer compares the treatment of adolescent girls by gender clinics to the fad for lobotomies.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread