Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

NHS trans guidance- URGENT request for help!

56 replies

Watermonster · 08/12/2020 14:19

Several of us have spent over a year trying to get local NHS policy to consider the needs of women, not just males who identify as women, in setting policy about wards, recommending puberty blockers and breast binding to teenage girls etc.
As a result the local NHS CCG reluctantly carried out an Equality Impact assessment, which shows the trans guidance directly harms women and girls. Even the doctors wrote in to complain. The board want to pass it anyway, but have opened a public survey for feedback by 15th December.
PLEASE help us by responding - 1000s of women will be negatively affected by this .Here's the info you need-

copy of the Equality impact assessment to read

bnssgccg-media.ams3.cdn.digitaloceanspaces.com/attachments/govbody_1Dec20_item6.1.pdf

and the survey for comments

bnssgccg.nhs.uk/get-involved/surveys-and-consultations/engagement-equality-impact-assessment-supporting-trans-people-best-practice-guidance/

OP posts:
Melroses · 08/12/2020 14:30

hokay Grin

DownWhichOfLate · 08/12/2020 14:38

Any chance you could summarise for us who want to help but don’t have much time?

Manderleyagain · 08/12/2020 16:17

Could you explain a bit more about this?
When is the deadline? Who is allowed to reply? Just people who live in the relevant area, or anyone?

HecatesCatsInXmasHats · 08/12/2020 16:26

What are the problems with the policy OP?

Watermonster · 08/12/2020 16:31

Deadline 15th December!
The toolkit is not a Bristol NHS thing- the EIA was undertaken by various NHS CCG's jointly. Patient surveys referred to in EIA are national and as far as I know this feedback is not restricted.

OP posts:
CuriousaboutSamphire · 08/12/2020 16:35

I get the deadline but not the specific issues, or intended audience.

I would love to help but, like many others, would like a hint...

Watermonster · 08/12/2020 16:41

1- EIA confirms the only group who will benefit will be those with gender reeassignment.
2- Nearly every other group will be negatively (or some neutrally) affected, especially women and those with religious beliefs, but the writer recommends the board pass it anyway.
3- Even doctors have written in to object about the negative impact of women and the use of unfactual ideological language in NHS policy (assigned at birth etc).

4- Following complaints, the revised version removes the requirement for women to be 're educated' if they object to mixed sex wards, as women are a protected characteristic, but does not give any protection to women as a result- still ignores womens needs in favour of those with gender reassignment

5- ignores Equality Act protection for single sex spaces inc hospital wards and recommends EHRC guidance (being challenged by Ann Sinnot) suggesting 'case by case' guidance
6-gives males choice of same sex or mixed sex wards but does not give women the same choice
7- does not require consent of women and clear plan to 'gaslight' women into mixed sex wards
8-falsely states males are no risk to females if they identify as women despite overwhelming evidence to contrary

OP posts:
Watermonster · 08/12/2020 16:45

9- no mention of how they will protect womens privacy and dignity
10-no mention of how they wil ensure access to care for women who can't use mixed sex wards
11- falsely states it will 'foster good relations' between those with gender reassignment and women/ other protected groups, despite clear evidence to the contrary
12- ignores evidence from medical staff of the negative impact on women and girls
13- makes no mention of de -transitioners/ gay teenage girls

OP posts:
Watermonster · 08/12/2020 16:49

14- no mention of waiting for the new NHS guidance ( the health secretary has already said NHS trans policy nationally must be reviewed)
www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/03/04/nhs-review-transgender-policies/
15- link to other mumsnet thread with more info, including on other NHS trusts across the country - with contributors more knowledgeable than me!

www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights/3784009-Are-you-in-Devon-Bristol-North-Somerset-or-South-Gloucestershire-Tell-NHS-your-view-on-trans-guidelines-NOW?pg=7

OP posts:
CuriousaboutSamphire · 08/12/2020 16:51

Thanks... reading now!

HecatesCatsInXmasHats · 08/12/2020 16:52

Thank you!

Highwind · 08/12/2020 16:53

Thank you Watermonster!

Angryresister · 08/12/2020 16:53

There is a cracking response to the toolkit and it looks like they have backed down in quite a few areas. However they fail to acknowledge the concern for actual women’s privacy and dignity and although they are perfectly well aware of why single sex wards are there, concern only extends to mental health facilities.. perhaps they should just ditch the whole leaflet as it is patently batshit.

Watermonster · 08/12/2020 17:00

@Angryresister
Yes, dumping it is what the letter from the doctors told them to do.

OP posts:
CuriousaboutSamphire · 08/12/2020 17:04

Ah ha! I have my response almst complete.. not quite Sth Glos, but decided to pretend I was still at Uni!

I used a lot from the previous thread, that you linked to! And have nigh on forced freinds to think about it properly....

LucretiaBourgeois · 08/12/2020 17:07

6-gives males choice of same sex or mixed sex wards but does not give women the same choice

If that's right, it would clearly be unlawful direct sex discrimination. How do they justify it?

CuriousaboutSamphire · 08/12/2020 17:08

TWAW - obvs!!!

LucretiaBourgeois · 08/12/2020 17:10

How do they justify it?

To be clear, in law direct sex discrimination can't be justified (as opposed to indirect discrimination, which potentially can). I just meant - how is this being justified as a proposal, given that it would be against the law?

LucretiaBourgeois · 08/12/2020 17:12

@CuriousaboutSamphire

TWAW - obvs!!!
But by that logic TMAM - are they beuing given the right to opt in to men's wards?
CuriousaboutSamphire · 08/12/2020 17:13

They all have their fingers in their ears, eyes closed, Lucretia

TWAW TWAW...

That has been the point of all of this utter flummery and aggression, isn't it?

Sadly for them there seems to be something of a coming to senses...

CuriousaboutSamphire · 08/12/2020 17:13

But by that logic TMAM - are they being given the right to opt in to men's wards? Probably! And if they do and men accept that...? Not my circus!

Watermonster · 08/12/2020 17:17

Yes if you identify as trans you can choose between same sex or opposite wards. But if you are a woman you can't, unless you identify as a man.
Yes the writer believes TWAW and could not comprehend some women have different beliefs or believe in science. The doctors' letter also picked up on this.

OP posts:
VulvaPerson · 09/12/2020 02:26

As a result the local NHS CCG reluctantly carried out an Equality Impact assessment, which shows the trans guidance directly harms women and girls.

The amount of shock I have reading this is insane. I would never have predicted selfID nonsense would negatively impact women and girls..great that someone has finally realised this!

LizzieSiddal · 09/12/2020 08:05

Ffs.

Why do women have to do all this work to fight against people wanting to break the law?! Is there any other area where this is happening?

If they do bring it in we will have to do yet more work and take legal action, which we would win.

Motherhubbardinthecellar · 09/12/2020 08:49

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.