Everything we have been warning about is confirmed in this court case and quite rightly the judges were horrified.
"Compounding these significant physical risks are psychological ones. Stopping a teenager's puberty so that she has, say, the vagina of a ten year old, also renders her out of step from her peers. Far from a "neutral" intervention, the "young person will have missed a period of...normal biological, psychological and social experience through adolescence" which "can never truly be recovered or 'reversed.'"
We've been saying this for years to indifference or abuse.
I've been listening to Abigail Shrier on various podcasts and she has done the proper investigative journalism into the situation that none of the so-called journalists at say The Guardian dare to do.