Cxlm (and whatever other mates hold a sinecure in Amnesty Ireland) have damaged (if not completely undermined) the brand. One of their tweets highlighting a poet in Myanmar who has been locked up for criticising the gov't just appears to be hypocritical. Someone has tweeted that Amnesty would be baying for the unfortunate detainee to be censured if he had criticised Transgender Ideology or said vulnerable women shouldn't be put at risk.
OH asked if we should join Amnesty. I think he thought we could then have a voice within it to protest their misogyny. I nearly spat my tea out in my haste to say they wouldn't be getting a brass farthing from me to spend on their war on women. They are a shell of what they once stood for. Bringing into disrepute and cheapening the imprimatur of an organisation which used to fairly defend the trampling on human rights and conscience. Not lobby for it.
Also, it seems quite a bit of the financial contributions go towards the big salaries for the few head honchos now. It also seems that 'loans' from Amnesty International into Amnesty Ireland are vital in keeping the Irish books afloat. Loans which are then written off.
Amnesty Ireland railed against the SIPO (Standards In Public Life) directive which limited the amount of 'foreign' donations/contributions allowed to be used by political groups/campaigns in Ireland to influence Irish policy/legislation. O'Gorman argues for foreign intervention when it suits him.
O’Gorman’s declaration that Irish law in this area is more draconian than Russia’s or Hungary’s, and that both Amnesty Ireland and the anti-abortion Iona Institute should be free to receive as much funding as they wish from foreign donors, so long as it is publicly declared.
www.irishtimes.com/opinion/editorial/political-donations-amnesty-s-defiance-1.3328924
Amnesty Ireland won that case due to a procedural flaw and didn't have to return their 'foreign' donation. I thought Colm hated 'foreign' interference and funding, though!
On 31st July 2018, the Standards in Public Office Commission (SIPO) accepted that the process leading to the adoption of a decision in November 2017, which requested Amnesty International to return a donation from the Open Society Foundations (OSF), was “procedurally flawed”. Fiona Crowley from Amnesty International explained that “the decision by the High Court makes no determination of the lawfulness of the OSF grant, but did agree to close its investigation into the grant”. SIPO also agreed to support part of the costs of the proceedings.
civicspacewatch.eu/ireland-regulator-settles-dispute-with-amnesty-ireland-over-foreign-funding/
There is a bill going through the Oireachtas at the moment to address previous legislation ('97 Act amended in 2001) on political donations. www.oireachtas.ie/en/bills/bill/2019/35/ . I'd be surprised if O'Gorman wasn't actively lobbying for their ability to receive foreign donations in this. It is interesting though, if they are exempt stricter levels of foreign donations and if advocacy groups like that aren't regulated (like a charity). Is there any restriction on what purpose they can use this money for? Who supervises them?
One interesting line from the Oireachtas debate from Senator Mary Seery Kearney was I understand the chilling effect on freedom of speech of advocacy groups . Would that she were prescient enough to refer to the chilling effect on the freedom of speech by advocacy groups. Well, by Amnesty Ireland. and TENI. NCWI are now under the control of TENI.