For goodness of sake, it's a perfectly normal sentence for an assault that didn't result in serious injury, there is no precedent being set here or any evidence of special treatment because of the all powerful trans
I have no idea whether the sentences were normal or not. I have no idea either, as pp said, if it’s normal to prosecute for public order rather than assault.
What I find distasteful is the judges comments that their behaviour was Ok. That because someone believes a woman is defined by biology, and states that belief in public, then it’s a 4 on 1 attack, stamping on head and kicking a person, is a reasonable reaction.
The statement that because someone fails to press charges, it must be because they know they’re in the wrong.
If what that boy said is such a horrific transphobic hate crime that he deserves a 4 on 1 beating, why wasn’t he prosecuted for it?