Apparently trans has come as a bit of a shock to older second wave feminists.
That is very funny, given they were the first group to raise concerns now, the group who were writing about males who identify as trans in the 70s, but they were shocked, I tell you shocked...
Good grief the ignorance is astounding. And way to go to make second wavers the villains in this drama. Passive villains with no agency at that.
Does this come from a base assumption that all women of a certain age who oppose transgender ideology and legislation must have been second wave feminists? And the ageist assumptions that women of this age cannot possibly be active in effecting social change?
Measured against the female population as a whole, there really were not that many actual second wave feminists back then. There are far fewer now.
There were of course many more women agreeing with the aims of the movement, especially the liberal feminist movement led by women like Friedan and Steinem. But today's libfems are largely cheerleaders of the ideology. However, that may be too difficult a concept to grasp if you honestly believe only the young campaign for change.
In my view, the feminist resistance to transgender ideology and legislation was mainly started by (often lesbian) radfems, including radical feminists of the second wave and they were decidedly in the minority then.