Threads

Topics

Usernames

Mumsnet Logo
Please
or
to access all these features

Statue to honour Wollstonecraft
716

MedusasBadHairDay · 10/11/2020 01:08

www.theguardian.com/books/2020/nov/10/mary-wollstonecraft-finally-honoured-with-statue-after-200-years

It's a naked woman..

Currently reading A Vindication of the Rights of Woman for an OU course, and - unless the tone changes dramatically in the second half of it - I'm not seeing how an idealised nude is the right statue to convey anything about her?

OP's posts:
Please
or
to access all these features

Butterer · 10/11/2020 01:17

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Please
or
to access all these features

Antibles · 10/11/2020 01:47

FFS. Would there be a statue of John Stuart Mill being 'born anew' in the buff?

If Mary Wollstonecraft, famous for her writing, had power over her statued form a couple of centuries on, I reckon she'd want clothes on it Hmm. As I would mine (for all my insightful feminist expositions, natch).

From that article: “I hope the piece will act as a metaphor for the challenges women still face as we confront the world.”

Well I suppose it does inasmuch as women still struggle to be recognised for their achievements but are often still reduced to tits and ass.

Please
or
to access all these features

IdblowJonSnow · 10/11/2020 01:53

Bloody hell, that's so typical.
What a disappointing and unimaginative representation.
Anyone feel like they're banging their head against a brick wall?

Please
or
to access all these features

HeirloomTomato · 10/11/2020 03:47

I was about to comment positively but, yes, what a disappointment. She deserves a statue to commemorate her, certainly. They could take down some of the statues of racists and slave-owners to make room for more statues of women like her. But the nude statue is odd. It hardly represents her intellectual heritage, does it?

Please
or
to access all these features

dontwantamirena · 10/11/2020 03:51

Why must women always be nude in the art world. Men don't get naked blobby ~spirit~ statues. They get lifelike representations.

This other design is miles better:
islingtontribune.com/article/visions-of-mary

Please
or
to access all these features

August20 · 10/11/2020 04:19

I was cheering at the thread title and then read your post. FFS.

The second design is much better - ironic that I prefer the man's statue design I suppose.

Please
or
to access all these features

dontwantamirena · 10/11/2020 04:51

While I realise that women are under appreciated in the art world, I wonder if in this case it might be a powerful thing to have had a man design her statue, considering how men viewed her in her time. I’m also not really a fan of women centred projects only involving women, I want both men and women to be involved, same for men centred projects.

Or does having a female artist make a bigger statement, regardless of design?

Please
or
to access all these features

Butterer · 10/11/2020 05:12

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Please
or
to access all these features

SweetGrapes · 10/11/2020 06:22

Well, a woman's body labelled Woman is extremely controversial nowadays.

Please
or
to access all these features

MedusasBadHairDay · 10/11/2020 07:19

I prefer the other version too, I agree with the campaign that we need more status of prominent women. But that's not a statue of Wollstonecraft, just a generic nude female, and those are already over represented.

OP's posts:
Please
or
to access all these features

ThinEndOfTheWedge · 10/11/2020 07:21

I wonder whether it was a provocative move on her part?

Yep - there isn’t as much news sculpting a woman - iconic and beloved by women for her visionary and intellect about the emancipation of women - without her tits.

I think there is a difference that you can showing a fictional character how you like - but to show an actual real human being - particularly a woman who lived in highly restrictive times for women and wanted to be equal to men - like this - is perverse.

But the artist doesn’t give a shit about her subject - just wants us talking about it - Which she’s succeeded in.

Please
or
to access all these features

PersonaNonGarter · 10/11/2020 07:25

It’s so disappointing. It’s just a 2020 sculpture for the artist and her art friends - the exact opposite of Everywoman/Wollstonecraft understanding.

Wollstonecraft had something very new and very brave to say in her time. That context and bravery has been lost.

Please
or
to access all these features

StandWithYou · 10/11/2020 07:43

@IdblowJonSnow

Bloody hell, that's so typical.
What a disappointing and unimaginative representation.
Anyone feel like they're banging their head against a brick wall?

Perhaps a statute of Mary Wollstonecraft banging her head against a brick wall and an inscription that says, ‘Is this still bloody happening’ might be more appropriate.
Please
or
to access all these features

ChattyLion · 10/11/2020 07:44

I was happy to click on this headline - hooray let’s celebrate her- but now I’m a bit baffled by the actual monument. That’s a good point though Sweetgrapes. Grin How are the woke people going to deal with that? How can they even know.. etc etc

Well I guess for me it’s about the fact that from the Guardian pic, rather than rise above a swirling mass of humanity she (if it is Mary at the top?) is rising above what looks like a swirling mass of distorted female bodies. So kind of a comment on misogyny reducing individual women to a distorted mass? But if so, also kind of reinforcing the ‘woman apart from other women’ type of trope. Which can be used in a pretty sexist way. Or, if it really is an ‘everywoman’ at the top then it feels more a comment on general misogyny and not specifically on Wollstonecraft herself. Whose work this monument is there to commemorate. Hmm.
I’m going to try thinking about this again after coffee.

Hopefully there’ll be more insight in the video launch tonight on social media mobile.twitter.com/maryonthegreen

Please
or
to access all these features

Antibles · 10/11/2020 09:33

There was a brief discussion of this at the end of the Today programme.

Didn't catch the name of the man who was talking but he 'explained' that 'clothes define people' and she is 'challenging the world'.

FFS Angry. Fine mate. You strip naked and see how the world challenging goes. Oh and you'll still most definitely be defined but not in the serious respectful manner I daresay you'd like.

He said the the other bodies are female forms.

It looks like a fountain of a water nymph not a representation of a celebrated writer. They've reduced a feminist icon to tits and arse. I think it bloody says it all really.

I guess a woman with clothes on holding a pen or a book is just too boring. Or too radical...

Please
or
to access all these features

littlbrowndog · 10/11/2020 09:43

What a horrid statue

Conveys nothing about her and seems like she is standing on top of women or shapeless forms

Why is she naked ffs

Please
or
to access all these features

Catfinkz · 10/11/2020 09:51

@ThinEndOfTheWedge

I wonder whether it was a provocative move on her part?

Yep - there isn’t as much news sculpting a woman - iconic and beloved by women for her visionary and intellect about the emancipation of women - without her tits.

I think there is a difference that you can showing a fictional character how you like - but to show an actual real human being - particularly a woman who lived in highly restrictive times for women and wanted to be equal to men - like this - is perverse.

But the artist doesn’t give a shit about her subject - just wants us talking about it - Which she’s succeeded in.

Yes absolutely- the artist was focused on making some kind of artistic point and completely detached from the importance of what MWC has done, and what a statue might mean to women today. Hackney Council obviously thought it's a woman artist, so we don't have to interrogate whether this is appropriate or not (it's not).
Please
or
to access all these features

MedusasBadHairDay · 10/11/2020 09:58

It's such a let down after that wonderful Fawcett statue!

I can't imagine Wollstonecraft would have approved of the statue, a woman who writes stuff like, "Taught from their infancy, that beauty is woman's sceptre, the mind shapes itself to the body, and, roaming round its gilt cage, only seeks to adorn its prison." would want her legacy to be represented by an idealised nude body.

OP's posts:
Please
or
to access all these features

LimitIsUp · 10/11/2020 09:58

Jesus - so are we to deduce from this that Mary Wollstonecraft had a nice rack? Hmm

Awful choice of commemorative statue

Please
or
to access all these features

RoyalCorgi · 10/11/2020 10:08

I'd expect an artist of Maggi Hambling's stature to know better. This is so depressing.

I'm all over Butterer's suggestion of knitting her a cardi.

Please
or
to access all these features

WinterIsGone · 10/11/2020 10:20

Didn't catch the name of the man who was talking but he 'explained' that 'clothes define people' and she is 'challenging the world'.
I thought that was Maggie Hamblin talking???

Please
or
to access all these features

TirisfalPumpkin · 10/11/2020 10:26

It’s definitely an idealised nude too, look at those perky breasts and flat tummy.

Please
or
to access all these features

Socrates11 · 10/11/2020 10:41

Oh bloody hell, really. How disappointing. Famous woman's representation in the public sphere....back to being naked, not groundbreaking in the slightest just boringly repetative.

Miriam Brody did a great piece in Feminist Theorists (1983) edited by Dale Spender, Mary Wollstonecraft: Sexualities and Women's Rights (1759-1797). Brody writes about Wollstonecraft's Vindication of the Rights of Woman being a herald for Enlightenment thinking looking for the discovery of truth through reason. Amongst other things Wollstonecraft wrote about the double standard of sexual behaviour in the 18th century that held women to a higher standard than men and was a great advocate for the right of women to be educated seeing it as a tool for improving civic and political emancipation.

Being reduced to a naked 'every woman' has totally missed the great legacy of Mary Wollstonecraft and her writing. What a damn shame. Yes, the statue needs a cardi but it definitely needed a pen.

Please
or
to access all these features

YetAnotherSpartacus · 10/11/2020 10:42

It's fucking awful.

I love the runner up.

It gives Mary the dignity that she deserves.

Please
or
to access all these features

Seatime · 10/11/2020 11:03

Yes, was shocked at the blob with typical sexual nude on top, reminds me of formula one imagery. I had pictured the statue of Wollstonecroft, in the dress of her time, striding forward or perhaps at her writing desk. Wollstonecroft was a brilliant and original feminist philosopher, this sculpture is a half assed overpriced pisstake.

Please
or
to access all these features
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.