Most of us aren’t women in prison so why are we bothering to try to protect them from being housed physically male bodied individuals who have been convicted of serious sexual crimes?
Well I seem to been deleted for the same sentiment. Or was it the swearing? Okay, then, I'll just have to get specific to avoid deletions.
OP do you agree that people like violent rapist, Karen White in my post above, are given access to incarcerated women, (who were subsequently sexually assaulted), as part of his sentence?
Do you agree that the women in the women's shelter should have been able to refuse to be housed with a male who uploaded naked photos posing in their bathroom boasting of sexually intimidating them?
What about the woman who went for her smear on the NHS, and whose notes said she was transphobic, because she objected to a male bodied individual, with stubble, touching her genitals? Do you agree with that?
Do you agree that Jessica Yaniv, a Canadian transwoman, who has expressed interest in helping 10-year-old girls with their tampons, should be able to sue beauticians for not waxing his scrotum? Many of whom subsequently went out of business as a result.
How about the transwoman running a female psychiatric ward, who posts endless selfies in PVC 'sexy nurses outfits'?
What about the women who have to put up with males masturbating next to them in a homeless shelter, because those males are really women?
How about Vancouver rape refuge which has been defunded, because it refuses to admit males, either as counsellors, or clients. It had a dead rat nailed to it's door, despite the fact that it is only one of all the rape refugees in Vancouver, which excludes men.
A dead rat. Nailed to a rape refuge. Because it's trying desperately to protect women who have already been raped.
It is the only one which has withstood targeting. Do you understand what is happening here? Everywhere that requires women to be protected on the basis of their sex, is targeted. Even, or perhaps especially, rape victims.
You'll find all these examples on the numerous threads you complain about in your OP.
If you think there is no need to establish sex segregation when women are vulnerable, having been raped, assaulted, or incarcerated and can't escape, have their knickers round their ankles, are naked, need searching, or need intimate medical procedures, perhaps you could explain why.
There aren't many occasions when women require sex segregation. But when they do, they should have it. It's not complicated.
You deciding that a certain cohort of men, indeed, the very men who are insisting on access and ignoring women's boundaries, should be given a free pass, is misogynistic.
You raised J. K. Rowling. She has received literally thousands upon thousands of threats. Most of them sex based funnily enough. Here is a fraction.
All she has said is that she has been the victim of domestic and sexual abuse and understands the need for women to be able to name their sex, politically, biologically and linguistically, so they can address the issue of sexual assault on women and girls. And that they need spaces based on sex segregation. In this instance, to recover.
I sincerely hope you do go away and read the links provided.
It's a measure of how women are being censored, that I have had to check my post to make sure it remains within guidelines. Fortunately, HQ have confirmed, that where someone is a criminal or a predator sexual or otherwise, correctly identifying their sex is completely. acceptable.