Hi OP.
In my capacity as a parent I have brought this up with an organisation who stated that accomm on a trip would be 'same gender' (i.e. mixed sex!
).
I pointed out that under the Equality Act 2010 biological sex is a protected category and the Act contains a number of single sex exemptions. Department of Education 2018 guidance:
“With regards to boarding accommodation, Schedule 23 of the Equality Act 2019 allows for separation by sex providing the same standard of accommodation is provided for both boys and girls.”
I also pointed out that EHRC clarification in 2018 states that under-18s cannot legally transition and are therefore legally the sex they were born irrespective of how they identify.
Whether the organisation chooses to do so or not, it is therefore lawful to exclude males from certain designated female-only spaces
I also pointed that an organisation has to demonstrate due regard to the potential impact on all the protected characteristics in the EA 2010 and had they done an Equality Impact Assessment before bringing in their trans inclusion policy on accommodation and whether trip attendees and their parents were consulted.
I got a response back telling me that they hadn't finalised their trans inclusion policy after all and were going to discuss my points at board level. I'm afraid that Covid 19 meant the trip didn't happen so I haven't yet pursued this further but I took their response to mean that they were taking me seriously.
I think many organisations need people to point out the actual law versus what the trans lobby has been saying. Clarity from the current judicial reviews will hopefully help in due course too.
Ultimately, I think the highlighting the safeguarding and legal minefield is the thing that might persuade organisations to stick with single sex provision. Highlight the worst case scenario: "What do you think our organisation's legal position will be if a female child is sexually assaulted or gets pregnant by a male child they were bunked up with on our trip?"