@OverTheRainbow88
Equally a little girl could follow another girl in and touch their bum.
Also wheelchair users always have mixed toilets.
I sometimes think adults make things into an issue for their children, I genuinely can’t see why mixed toilets is an issue for any sex.
Drop the bullshit that girls pose the same risk as boys. Just fucking stop with that mealy-mouthed, dishonest, fundamentally misogynist lie. A girl is raped on school premises every single day of the school year. And those are just the ones reported to the police, and that's just at the extreme end of the sexualised and sexist abuse teenage girls have to deal with - from harrassment, all the way up to serious assault. I'm sure you think girls are just as likely to be doing the sexual harrassing, assaulting and raping though, right?
98% of sex offending is by males. Comprehensives have thousands of kids, and by definition must take any and all. That means teenage girls are living cheek by jowl with hundreds of teenage boys, not all of whom will be benign. Of the UK population, 1 in 2500 males are in jail for a sex offence at any one time - not those with a conviction, but actually in jail. We have fewer than 1.5% of reported rapes even being charged, far less convicted, and we still have that level of imprisonment. It's an absolute guarantee that a comprehensive will be teaching boys who have committed, or will commit, serious sexual offences, and yet you profess astonishment that girls may want separate spaces to remove their clothing? When there are gaps above and below the cubicle? And that's even without the reality that many fundamentally harmless, just immature teenage boys find nothing more hilarious than mocking girls who have their periods, or their knickers round their ankles... and will also be showing off to their mates.
Disabled loos are individual and fully enclosed rooms. There is no comparison whatsoever. It's about as sane, honest and rational as those whining that our own bathrooms are unisex.
Did you even go to a mixed sex school? Was it a large comprehensive, if so? The potential for sexualised bullying is just enormous, in mixed sex loos. Which is why it's against the law not to provide single sex loos for kids over 8. I have no issue with mixed sex loos for under 8s, as it happens. Over that, and yes, it matters - and by secondary years, it matters enormously. Which is why it is the fucking law to begin with.
girls are more at physical risk holding in their wee all day than they are using a mixed toilet.
If they are doing that, then clearly they have a reason. One important enough for them to make that choice. Who do you think you are, dismissing their feelings and instincts like that and opining (alongside the clear lie that girls pose the same risk as boys) that they're just being silly?