She made it clear that she supports cancel culture as long as it's not directed at her or people she likes! I thought that was so stupid, and I'm amazed that even the intellectual slugs arguing on the other side couldn't do anything with that.
This is one of the inherent problems with figuring out what is and isn't free speech, where the line is drawn as to what warrants deplatforming or someone losing work opportunities.
It's not easy because to be consistent you do have to defend things you consider dreadful in order to retain the right to speak about things you consider important (which other people may find dreadful).
I've thought about it a lot and like most people I don't think my position is completely consistent 100% of the time.