Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Resisting T***s And Transforming Their Organizations

21 replies

yourhairiswinterfire · 04/09/2020 12:17

Inside the mind of an unhinged transactivist, and what they want to achieve.

archive.fo/K2IQ1

I saw this posted elsewhere a while ago and thought it was someone taking the piss, but I think it's becoming clearer each day that this is exactly what they're aiming for. (This is the archived version, because the poster on the other forum didn't want the author getting hits to their site.)

It reads like a to-do list. How to takeover and subdue women. It includes:

Tactics to make women only spaces include all women (transwomen)

Leadership reform The author writes A gradual strategy that can succeed is infiltration and replacement (Like allowing biological men to take positions intended for women.)

Purse Strings There are several ways to hurt a hate group’s purse strings: political lobbying, boycotts, picketing, and lawsuits. (Vancouver rape crisis centre, anyone?)

Deplatforming In this section, they seem to be encouraging being violent to ts. They add Attacking bystanders just makes Ts look sympathetic. Don’t do anything you can’t handle the consequences of. In other words, just make sure you attack the 'right' person Hmm

Against Presence This talks about getting people shut down on social media, and "review bombing" people on Yelp and Facebook. Includes tips on how to dox people.

Damage their property. Speaks for itself.

Against persons Apparently it's fine to hit women if you're okay with the consequences.

Just want to pee in peace, eh? I feel dirty after reading this. Can't pretend this isn't exactly what's happening.

OP posts:
Xanthangum · 04/09/2020 12:39

Izaguirre has form - this piece encourages direct action (amongst other things) against Vancouver Rape Relief.

archive.is/KC1qP

They don't appear to have had anything published recently though.

MoltenLasagne · 04/09/2020 12:41

This doesn't surprise me - didn't Vancouver Rape Relief get a dead rat nailed to its door by these activists?

yourhairiswinterfire · 04/09/2020 12:50

@MoltenLasagne

This doesn't surprise me - didn't Vancouver Rape Relief get a dead rat nailed to its door by these activists?
They did, and they graffitied 'kill t*s' 'fuck t*s' and 'TWAW' on the windows. The council also withdrew $30,000 in funding to the centre.
OP posts:
AlbusSirius · 04/09/2020 13:02

Fucking hell Shock - that's quite a read, and worth reading the whole thing as it gets worse as it goes on.

Some highlights:

"TERF’s, like all Nazis, have no right to a peaceful existence or steady employment."

Collect and collate information and then "When the fascist database comes online, submit everything you have. That will give the global coalition against hate as complete a picture as possible of who needs re-education."

"If TERF’s couldn’t step into public venues without fear of being drenched in milkshakes, they might think twice about their allegiance to hate."

I could actually quote the whole thing, it's extraordinary. And even more extraordinary that it isn't being denounced by your average everyday trans person who "just wants to pee".

OhHolyJesus · 04/09/2020 13:27

What is "Nazi Adjacent"? Is it when you stand next to a Nazi? Is Nazi airborne, can you catch it like Covid?

I'm taking the piss obvs but this stuff shouldn't be dismissed. Their tactics work, it's highly effective.

SunsetBeetch · 04/09/2020 13:31

This person is really disturbed

Melroses · 04/09/2020 22:29

That is quite a to do list.

DeaconBoo · 04/09/2020 23:15

So if trans rights are human rights, and human rights allow you to do all of these things they're suggesting, they think it's fine to treat trans people like this?
Or is it ok to decide some groups of people should not have human rights?
"They threaten the safety and dignity of others and therefore deserve none themselves until they choose to be human once more."

Oh, it's the latter. It's ok for some humans to identify other humans as non-human.

Antibles · 05/09/2020 05:31

Oh, it's the latter. It's ok for some humans to identify other humans as non-human.

Definitely dehumanising the enemy so that you can justify violence against them. There's a glee to it here. Like a sociopath gets when they see an opportunity to strike at someone. It's never really about the specific issue, the issue is just cover used to hurt someone else and get away with it. An incredibly dangerous mindset.

AsTreesWalking · 05/09/2020 07:36

Oh but the article does state that It’s important to avoid killing so that's quite reasonable, really.

ColleagueFromMars · 05/09/2020 08:26

Human rights for all Hmm

Kazakaren · 05/09/2020 08:31

The links not working. Think I've read that before. It disappeared last time I read it too. I should have got a copy of it. Its quite an eye opener.

ThinEndoftheWedge · 05/09/2020 08:41

Yep - they are definitely on right side of history here not.

endofthelinefinally · 05/09/2020 10:08

The genocide of the Rohinga people was orchestrated on facebook. Something to contemplate.

BrollyKnickers · 05/09/2020 10:13

I wonder what happened to that person? To hate women that much?

WALKING2 · 05/09/2020 10:16

Why do some trans activist hate biological women so much?

IHeartSusanDey · 05/09/2020 10:24

I think the whole reason they ARE trans activists is because they hate women.

TinselAngel · 05/09/2020 10:39

I believe one of the things the article mentions (I'm not giving it clicks) is targeting individual women to get them banned from social media, which of course is exactly what has been going on here on FWR, that has resulted in influential posters being banned or suspended.

MichelleofzeResistance · 05/09/2020 12:08

It's obviously very unfortunate for trans activists that they seem to have very disturbed and clearly very behaviourally/ethically challenged people attaching themselves onto the movement. You'd think they would be very keen to publicly distance themselves from things like this in case of the general public coming to believe that the movement is happily including women-hating, sociopathic/psychopathic extremist believers in their midst, and share in their values. And that they would want to reflect on what it is about trans activism that attracts such worrying types to them.

After all, if you were to change the words in here from the chosen euphemism for 'female not doing as I command' to religious non believers, this would be material that the anti terrorism unit may well have interest in as wholly unacceptable.

BrollyKnickers · 05/09/2020 13:45

Excellent points Michelle..

yourhairiswinterfire · 05/09/2020 14:05

Definitely dehumanising the enemy so that you can justify violence against them. There's a glee to it here. Like a sociopath gets when they see an opportunity to strike at someone. It's never really about the specific issue, the issue is just cover used to hurt someone else and get away with it. An incredibly dangerous mindset.

They are sinister. Genuinely can't tell the difference between MRAs, incels and TRAs anymore, they seem to have merged in to one vile group, full of deep, seething hatred for women.

Agree with dehumanising the enemy. That's why t**f isn't a harmless little acronym. The way it's used through this 'article' is chilling.

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page