This article is nearly a year old so apologies if there has already been a thread on it. It's about fertility in women over the age of 35. However the article scrupulously avoids mentioning the words 'woman', 'female', 'man' and 'male':
www.google.com/amp/s/www.self.com/story/fertility-age-35/amp
It does reluctantly use the word 'woman' when discussing historical records, but reverts to 'people with ovaries' as soon as the article turns to the present day. Men are referred to as 'people who produce sperm'.
It's just utterly absurd.