She said "They're racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic".
A politician is able to defend themselves against charges like this by giving examples of where they have, on the record, done the opposite. So examples of charity work, donations, speeches in support of gay rights, women’s rights, campaigns they have led, policy they have changed and so on.
What evidence of that sort can a woman use against a charge of being nasty? It’s is a subjective term. Any response made to a charge like that will only be met with further derision.
Back to the point about Trump being embroiled in the Epstein affair, the reason it is relevant to Ghislaine Maxwell is that she has been arrested in the US and did not flee to France where she could have had diplomatic protection. Why not flee to France unless she had sure protection on her side, and what could come higher than the president.
Why Hillary didn’t use such sensitive information about Trump, if she had it, is what puzzles me and it may mean if Bill is involved she did not what to involve him in case of further legal charges.
The election is gone. But their relationship and the crimes they may or may not have committed together remain and this is now something Ghislaine may use to her advantage. The question really is how deep is the rot.
To bring out, means to bring up 