I hardly dare click the link; just the title of the thread's got me annoyed.
Women (XX becunted variety) who are unable to put on a socially-approved performance of femininity are at a disadvantage compared to women (XX becunted variety) who are able to navigate the murky waters of this mechanism of oppression without any visible psychological fallout.
Transwomen, who are not XX becunted type people, are pretty irrelevant to that.
It's obvious that XY people who want to indulge in expression coded (by other XY people) as "feminine", "girly" or "sissy" get a raw deal. But, again, nothing to do with women.
part of my mind is permanently engaged in the job of trying to avoid it by appearing normal, feminine and unthreatening
The staggering ignorance of the reality of being female is mindblowing. Dressing in girl clothes will not save you. Painting your face will not save you. Contorting yourself to be pleasing to the male gaze will not save you. No amount of "gender expression" can save you from the physiological fact of your vagina being a weakpoint through which males may violate and dominate you with their penises.
JiggeryWokery's right. It's victim-blaming bullshit; saying women are safe from harassment and assault if they meet patriarchal beauty standards is saying it's our own fault when we get raped for not being pretty and submissive enough.
Yes, corrective rape of non-conforming women is a thing. That doesn't mean women who conform are safe.