Smith appears to be on the unofficial must not be criticized list so no doubt this thread will go.
What I don’t understand, genuinely don’t understand, is:
Sam Smith is a cunt.
Sam Smith is a man.
This is one of the few uk based forums (at least one I’m a member of) that allows uncensored language on it. One of the above statements is an opinion, the other one is a truth. One contains an offensive and insulting word and the other one does not. One of those statements from me is a lie and the other one isn’t (I don’t actually think SS is a cunt, I just used it for the point, I find him annoying with a shrill singing voice but that’s the extent of it).
Why is the aggressive, opinionated statement fine to stand on here but the non-aggressive, truthful statement considered a risk for deletion? What is it about this that makes it delete-worthy specifically compared to writing a post calling someone a cunt, just because I felt like it? Man, male, male-born, male-bodied, men.. these are not offensive words or insults, so it’s not even on the level of free speech, like calling someone specifically derogatory names like a ft or a nr or a p**i, just because someone has the ability to call someone those sorts of names, so they will.
It’s so disproportionate. On here, and in real life too.