@DuLANGDuLANGDuLANG
Which is why I said it needs to have an end point and plan to save a deposit and move on.
I take your point, I missed that aspect, but i would still say that it make one set of human being far too dependent on a second set of human being, and apart from being a petrie dish for coercive control in either direction, the majority of sex workers I have known have a really distinct tendency to be more individual and independent than the norm, so that level of dependency would be forcing them against their strength and smack bang into their weaknesses.
I have always believed that it is better to facilitate and signpost a sex worker to enable her to function as independently as possible. Most of then are "job ready" and do not need counselling or direction, the difficulties are more likely to be structural, like disability, or a special needs child, or dual carer obligations...
Some of those structural problems do not have solutions at all, which is scary enough to look at, let alone live, but a business providing suitable work with a living wage is a great start. Facilitating self employment is another.
Destigmatisation so people do not have to lie themselves inside out to get an interview might achieve a great deal more than you would expect, I don't know, but it seems worth a try, BUT to do that would require abandoning a huge body of abolitionist rhetoric and facing up to looking at and accepting what kind of people sex workers really are, their real strengths, their real needs and their real limits
BUT...none of the organisations that are getting the funding are even attempting to provide any of these things...I gave up trying to reason with them 20 years ago.
It's nice to come across other people who are still trying though.