Has the journo missed out on the last two years of the debate?
We've discussed non-stop that there is now no government funded women's or equalities organisation left in Scotland that supports upholding the right of females to define themselves in a category of their own, separately from males. With their own sovereign spaces, services and sports and other legal set asides that seek to redress the inequality females suffer in a male-dominated world.
We've found they've either supported others to do so or demanded themselves that the Equality Act 2010 was amended to abolish the basis of our rights, the sex-based exemptions which form the core of women's sex-based rights.
We've uncovered harmful practices, we've uncovered that none of these organisations consulted their members before deciding to advocate for and endorse transgender ideology and legislation.
We've discussed that many of the new grassroots groups are founded or led by or include frontline workers and staff from these organisations, who know they cannot speak out against harmful practices that disregard the rights of women and children. not without suffering the consequences.
And we've listened to the frontline workers and the "service users" tell us about the problems that arise when you include males in a female-only space. And how informed consent only matters when it's 12 year olds agreeing to lose their fertility and sexual function, but not when it's adult females being told they must accept males in their spaces and services without their consent even being sought.
We've noted that they made sure they were all on board with promoting this ideology by sitting on each other's boards. So much so they did not even bother putting in individual submissions, but rather issued a joint one.
It's formed an enormous part of our submissions to government consultations, our FOIs, the media and our questions to MSPs. So the journo couldn't possibly have researched any of this too well, or she'd have noticed this huge aspect of the debate.