Private Eye, Maya Forstater, Jayne Langley

[PaleBlueMoonlight]

There is a letter in the current issue of Private Eye from Jayne Laker, which sums up the problem with the Forstater decision in impressively few words. The letter is attached, plus the letter from the previous issue to which it is a response.

And the original article in the previous issue.

*Langley, not Laker

Well put.

Social media gives a couple different sense of time - I'd almost forgotten about the "kimono-clad killer."

Here's the letter the right way up. I disagree with the verdict.

When the Gender Recognition Bill went through the House of Lords the Minister in charge (Lord Filkin) said:

"The noble Baroness also asked whether people who refuse to call a gender-changed man by the changed gender would be open to action. No, they would not, unless they had information about the person's gender history in an official capacity and they disclosed it otherwise than is allowed for by Clause 21". [Hansard, Lords, 29/01/04 col 411]"
publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200304/ldhansrd/vo040129/text/40129-24.htm

Image doesnt seem to have uploaded;

Thanks TheInebriati - I seem to be having all sorts of problems this evening.