Yes, but that doesn't mean that wearing obviously sexually alluring/provocative clothing is without meaning or intention, on the part of the wearer, though. Obviously no-one is suggesting that women are responsible fro men's actions, but women do have choices and responsibility too.
That's a pretty low bar to be considered "sexually provocative" you've set there. It's 2020 in the UK, bare shoulders aren't really considered scandalous any more (though as I said earlier, the HOC defaults to suit type outfits so the dress wasn't ideal for that reason).
Also, blaming women for men's actions doesn't somehow become not blaming just because you say "I'm not blaming the though". There's a reason why so many people are taking your comments that way.
On another point that's been mentioned, of course there are men's clothes that are considered sexy, though current men's fashion is a bit dull in that regard. Look back at the arse and crotch hugging trousers of the 70s for an example. Even now there are men (Russell Brand springs to mind as an example) who often dress in a "sexy" way. It's just that they don't get shamed for it or blamed for the way others respond to it in the way women do.