I wonder if what Buck means is that most people respond to him as if he’s a man
That’s my take too - from a gender critical viewpoint there’s a clear logic error in the phrase ‘as a man/woman’, it’s fairly meaningless, because in our utopia (or mine at least) there wouldn’t be any bloody difference between how one is treated/acts/presents/lives based on a male/female or man/woman divide - with the notable exception of matters directly relating to our biological realities such as intimate healthcare, reproduction, physical equipment/clothing etc. (Obvs in this utopia, male pattern violence/violence against women&girls also just isn’t a thing that we need to worry about & safeguard specifically against).
We don’t live in a gender critical utopia though, so I do have an understanding of what is meant by the phrase ‘as a man/woman’....I translate it as ‘judged by sex-based stereotypes’.
I find Buck a very interesting character, I’ve followed him on Twitter for a while, he has a lot more self awareness than the average trans celebrity, he always seems to want to draw a line between ‘true trans’/old school transexual (ie, himself) and the transgender umbrella brigade though. Not quite sure where he is on self-ID legislation. Ultimately though, at least he doesn’t seem to be wanting to deliberately shit on women, and is vaguely more grounded in reality than those that insist they’ve always been the opposite sex etc.