I wouldn’t worry too much about this ignorant crap making it onto the statute books. The local gynaecologists will point out it’s an impossible procedure, and they certainly won’t accept the threat of jail for doing their jobs. If the legislators consult even one doctor before voting on the bill, it will get shot down.
No, I can’t imagine it will make it into legislation, since any law forcing medics to perform an impossible procedure would be wide open to legal challenge.
But the point here is not the possibility of appalling law becoming reality, the point is about shifting the Overton window to the right. If there is actual debate and legislative proposals taking place about something so patently bonkers, then suddenly things which would seem horribly restrictive in any normal context will suddenly seem quite reasonable in comparison.
And that is how they are proposing to overturn Roe v Wade, by shifting the public’s perception of what is reasonable or acceptable.