Another one hiding in plain sight? Dr Bruce Hensel

[SunsetBeetch]

twitter.com/Sseltse/status/1194987547002359813?s=19

Bruce Hensel, Former NBC chief medical correspondent, and prominent trans rights campaigner arrested for asking 9-year-old for sexually explicit photos!

#inplainsght #safeguarding #brucehensel t.co/3mqUaFn478

nypost.com/2019/11/14/ex-nbc-correspondent-bruce-hensel-arrested-for-asking-9-year-old-for-sexual-photos/amp/?__twitter_impression=true

abc7.com/amp/ex-tv-medical-correspondent-arrested-by-lapd-juvenile-division/5624361/?__twitter_impression=true

Dr. Bruce Hensel, an Emmy-winning former television medical correspondent in Los Angeles and New York, was arrested today for allegedly asking a 9-year-old girl to send him sexually suggestive photos.

t.co/51vYH7lHeX

twitter.com/PatriotAM1150/status/1195038649810923520?s=19

Absolutely flabbergasted at the turn this thread has taken. Wishing I had something clever to contribute.

Just... are we still allowed, as mums, to say that pedophiles are bad and dangerous and that rules to protect children should not be loosened in ways that give pedophiles more opportunities to harm children?

Watch someone report that last comment as a "personal attack", and the mods agree with them because what is context?

sǝsɐɔ lɐıɔǝds ǝɹɐ sɹoʇıuoɯ ǝɥʇ

We should be safe if we type upside down.

¿uǝɹpןıɥɔ ɯɹɐɥ oʇ sǝıʇıunʇɹoddo ǝɹoɯ sǝןıɥdopǝd ǝʌıƃ ʇɐɥʇ sʎɐʍ uı pǝuǝsooן ǝq ʇou pןnoɥs uǝɹpןıɥɔ ʇɔǝʇoɹd oʇ sǝןnɹ ʇɐɥʇ puɐ snoɹǝƃuɐp puɐ pɐq ǝɹɐ sǝןıɥdopǝd ʇɐɥʇ ʎɐs oʇ 'sɯnɯ sɐ 'pǝʍoןןɐ ןןıʇs ǝʍ ǝɹɐ ˙˙˙ʇsnſ

Testing, testing. 1 2 3.

Always at weekends always without fail

Tut fucking tut

That 9 year old girl should have said tut tut

New safeguarding. Rules tut tut

That’s how it works isn’t it

Tut tut

ǝlqɐɹǝulnʌ ǝɹoɯ uǝɹplıɥɔ ɹno sǝʌɐǝl spɹɐnƃǝɟɐs ƃuıʌoɯǝɹ

Risky

Safeguarding so last year. Fuck that safeguarding.

www.upsidedowntext.com/
Will this save our sanity?
Did you know that everyone can't read upside down or backwards. I did not know that until recently.

www.typeupsidedown.com

I wonder what percentage of the monitor ɹǝsol population cannot read upside down

ʎuunɟ llɐ sǝʎǝ ʎɯ ƃuᴉʞɐɯ s,ʇᴉ ɥɥɥɥɥɥ∀

I wonder what percentage of the monitor ɹǝsol population cannot read upside down

Okay, you win.

Aaaaaaaand - on a serious note: WTAF, Mumsnet? When we say the monitors do you read all trans people? Cos that doesn't say a great deal for your understanding of the boards you're moderating. At all.

Thankyou langcleg for introducing me to upsidedownspeak

I think henceforth we should use upsidedownspeak when really we mean utterbollocks to avoid offence deletions
Can't argue with that

I can read it upside down, and backwards.
Am I weird? I'm weird, aren't I? misses point

Yes you are, and so am I. I confess I was somewhat shocked to discover this about myself, but not about you.

I find it easy to read too

Most of it is easy to read but adding italics too is just taking the piss.

(Side eyes Lang)

Yes me too. It's a handy skill because for some reason, a lot of people don't think it's possible and leave information you're not supposed to read in plain sight when they're talking to you

Yes you are, and so am I. I confess I was somewhat shocked to discover this about myself, but not about you

Also reading from the bottom of the page up (and upside down) can be very handy to get the gist of a document.

What @vickyjgo said.

FloralBunting
I think the only person on the thread that has linked is vickyjgo

Seriously? You're turning it round on vicky as the one doing it?
Come off it for FFS, there's a word for that.
Gaslighting.
I can see at least one post standing where someone has.
Didn't see what the deleted ones said, but seeing as it's on the thread elsewhere could be that.
I'm not surprised MN aren't getting back with "what did I do?!" emails when even when someone attempts to answer you get twisty responses like florals!

Just to clarify, MNHQ: it is now forbidden to make negative generalisations about the self-described network that regularly monitors Mumsnet which includes both trans and non trans people and is nicknamed the monitors hereabouts?

Yes? No? Will the rules be amended to reflect this?

www.vice.com/amp/en_us/article/a3mn9k/mumsnet-uk-mom-forum-terf-transphobia-feminism

I’m liking the idea of upside down writing to protect ourselves from deletion. I’m really wanting to give something risky a go.

˙ǝq llıʍ sʎɐʍlɐ puɐ uǝɯ ǝɹɐ uǝɯoʍ suɐɹʇ

Oh, Wotcha, are you one of the sweet sorts who don't know that we're referring to the weakening of safeguarding by those pushing a trans privilege line, thus allowing predators to predate? You really think this whole thing is us saying trans people are all paedos?
Is this one of those cases where the monitors are simply too bloody stupid to realize that if you open a door on a submarine to let someone in, you won't be able to keep the water out?