Last para of the Telegraph article.
Mr Easley, who had travelled over to the UK from the US to give evidence in the case, said: “The organisation’s position is that we make no distinction between sex and gender. If someone is in our space and they say that are a woman then they can have access to the single sex spaces. To deny them access means we would be infringing on their rights.”
According to him, if a man says he's a woman it would be an infringement of his rights not to give him access to women's single sex spaces. Does he not see the contradiction here that by doing this he is removing women's right to single sex spaces?
Is he really that stupid or just exceptionally misogynistic?