NSPCC Again

[SunsetBeetch]

"Head of ‘child safety’ at the NSPCC. More parts of a terrible jigsaw now falling into place. Can you see what it is yet? t.co/nJKd5nYt1B "

"Bizarre and concerning response of NSPCC to those worried about the antics of one of its employees maybe not so much a mystery now t.co/N0KNloLCxl "

Children's online safety.

From his Linkedin

"Head of Child Safety Online and Innovation

Dec 2017 – Present1 year 11 months
London, United Kingdom

• Delivery of all of the charity’s public affairs and policy work to keep children safe from abuse online and support parents, carers and professionals.
• Leading work to change Government policy and make social networks safer for children, with a successful public affairs campaign on Duty of Care.
• With £1m/year commercial partnership, delivering advice to parents on online safety.
• Member of UK Council for Internet Safety
• Frequent media spokesperson and commentator.- Delivery of all of the charity’s public affairs and policy work to keep children safe from abuse online and support parents, carers and professionals.
• Leading work to change Government policy and make social networks safer for children, with a successful public affairs campaign on Duty of Care.
• With £1m/year commercial partnership, delivering advice to parents on online safety.
• Member of UK Council for Internet Safety
• Frequent media spokesperson and commentator."

Foxes in the henhouse.

Wow. That didn't take long.

Is that the NSPCC's official stance? I think Tony should read the social media employee policy.

NSPCC needs an external investigation by government. It has statutory power, FFS.

Suddenly their initial support for the rubber fetish toilet wanker guy (his name escapes me) makes sense.

I can’t see that, can someone please transcribe the screenshot?

Sarah Phillimore (hi Sarah 👋) makes some excellent points about attitudes towards male sexual entitlement.

twitter.com/svphillimore/status/1187083831347683329?s=21

What Lang said.

whatisthisfuckery I can see it but I can't explain it because I don't understand it

I realise that rapid evolution of social media terms is a key part of all this but I can't keep up with it.

If you click on the links, they are still up on Twitter.

I find this tweet even more concerning; he is concerns that children aren't given enough privacy by their parents online. How the actual fuck does a man with this agenda end up in a job like this?!

.

Pic not posting, trying again

HOW did he end up in this job? WTF is wrong with the NSPCC?

Ever wondered why they go so hard against posie?

I mean apart from the fab hair and all that?

It's because she's highlighting this stuff: This complete bonfire of child safeguarding, this utter sexualisation of children that's going on. Seems to be acceptable to the likes of the NSPCC and Peter Tatchell. But not us, not to posie, not to Sara Phillimore, not to mumsnetters.

I don't know what the significance is of the AbFab picture though? Love a bit of AbFab myself, and as far as I'm aware, it never sexualised children?

Oh, I hadn't seen those tweets in the screenshots.

Pregnant women must recuse themselves from popular sexualised literature. How very Handmaid's Tale.

@zebrasdontwearbras I think the Ab Fab gif is just him flicking the finger at LGBalliance. Don't think it's relevant or a problem it's Ab Fab.

Oh right I get it.

Well I reckon Eddy & Pats are on our side. Saffy would possibly be woke nowadays

Glass of Bolly darling?

Fucking HELL.

Dear whoever is in charge of child safeguarding in this country.

Can you please step in and have a deep trawl through the NSPCC and order a very thorough investigation? It has become very apparent they are dodgy as fuck.

Yours,

FWR

It reveals a misogynistic, male-centred, porn normalising culture that puts LGBT rights ahead of child protection - from
hiring 'DM me if you want to chat' MB, to the bloke wanking/filming in the bogs & now this. Really, really concerning. Doesn't the NSPCC have the will or the integrity to see why these employees (who seem to think they can get away with unprofessional & unethical behaviour IRL and online) are a huge red flag that betrays how messed up their priorities have become? It's baffling & depressing. To protect LGBT rights at all costs has created a culture where these guys think they can get away with anything. Is it poor judgement or something far, far more worrying going on here?

These people evidently see the celebration of porn as a basis for their work in safeguarding. There's an intrinsic lack of awareness of children's needs and boundaries that is exceptionally troubling in an organisation allegedly devoted to safeguarding children.

I find this tweet even more concerning; he is concerns that children aren't given enough privacy by their parents online. How the actual fuck does a man with this agenda end up in a job like this?!

Yeah, I found that thread calling parental internet monitoring systems 'horrifying' to be really odd given his job.

The system he (and linked thread) complain about seems to be one which uses keywords and watchlists to flag up when a child's browsing needs investigation- rather than blocking or wholesale monitoring.

mobile.twitter.com/tony_stower/status/1186929740835426304

It's hard to be clear but the issue seems to be a lack of privacy opt out for 'Black, brown, trans or neurodivergent youth'; though he seems against 'controlling children' online in general.

NSPCC take the opposite view here:

www.nspcc.org.uk/preventing-abuse/keeping-children-safe/online-safety/parental-controls/

I had to look again, just to be sure, but he really is Head of Child Safety Online for the NSPCC.

Bloody hell. That is really worrying. Is privacy a more important value than safety when working with children & vulnerable young people? Madness.

His Tweets are now protected.

Oh well that's reassuring.